Advanced Search Results
M.S. Avadhani Vs. State of Mysore and ors.
Karnataka
Medapa, C.J. and ;Vasudevamurthy, J.
Jul-23-1953
Election
Mysore Town Municipalities Act, 1951 - Sections 14, 14(1)(A), 14(2), 14(3) and 20; Constitution of India - Articles 190(3), 191, 192, 192(1), 193 and 226; Election Rules - Rules 2, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 7
AIR1954Kant18; AIR1954Mys18
Vasudevamurthy, J. 1. The petitioner offered himself as a candidate for election to the Town Municipal Council, Hiriyur, and was declared duly elected at the elections on 12-3-1952. On 5-5-1952 there was an election for choosing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Mysore Vs. V. Sampangiramiah
Karnataka
Medapa, C.J. and ;Vasudevamurthy, J.
Oct-23-1952
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 192, 212, 235, 331 and 423; Defence of India Rules, 1939 - Rules 81(4), 89(4) and 89(6); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) Act, 1922; Kerosene Control Order, 1948 - Rules IX and XV; Defence of India Act - Sections 2(5); Defence of India Rules - Rule 89(4) and 89(6)
AIR1953Kant80; AIR1953Mys80
Vasudevamurthy, J.1. This is an appeal by the State against an order of acquittal passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Bangalore Division, setting aside the conviction and sentence passed against the accused by the City...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKesave Seethamma Vs. Bombay Life Assurance Co. Ltd.
Karnataka
Vasudevamurthy, J.
Dec-17-1952
Insurance
Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 45; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 35; Mysore Insurance Act, 1939 - Sections 45
AIR1954Kant134; AIR1954Mys134
Vasudevamurthy, J1. The plaintiff is the widow of one K. Srinivasaiya who died on 8-9-1945 at Koppa. He had insured his life with the defendant company for Rs. 3000/- and the plaintiff sued to recover that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
P.R. Chikka Subba Rao and ors. Vs. Nama Ramaswami Setty and ors.
Karnataka
Medapa, C.J. and ;Vasudevamurthy, J.
Nov-27-1952
PropertyCivil
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 82; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 20, Rule 12; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105; Probate and Administration Act - Sections 90; Mysore House Rent Control Order, 1948 - Rules 9, 9(1) and 16
AIR1954Kant42; AIR1954Mys42; ILR1953KAR470; (1954)32MysLJ209
Vasudevamurthy, J.1. These six Regular Appeals and two Second Appeals relate to as many suits filed by one Nama Ramaswamy Setty in the Court of the Munsiff of Kolar for ejectment and enhanced rents by way...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJayachamarajendra Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Madaiah and anr.
Karnataka
Vasudevamurthy, J.
Aug-22-1950
Trusts and Societies
Mysore Co-operative Societies Act, 1948 - Sections 53, 60, 60(1) and 60(2)
AIR1951Kant9; AIR1951Mys9
ORDERVasudevamurthy, J.1. These two revision petitions have been filed against the order of the Additional Subordinate Judge of Mysore in Execution cases, Nos. 840 and 1216 of 1947-48 on his file. Sri Jayachamarajendra Co-operative Society Ltd.,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB. Rajeswariamma Vs. K.M. Viswanath
Karnataka
Vasudevamurthy, J.
Feb-19-1953
FamilyCriminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 488 and 488(3); Mysore Hindu Law Women's Rights Act, 1933 - Sections 23
AIR1954Kant31; AIR1954Mys31
ORDERVasudevamurthy, J.1. This is a revision petition which has been filed against the order of the City Magistrate, Bangalore, dismissing the petitioner's application for maintenance against her husband under section 488, Criminal P. C. The respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThimmarayappa Vs. Narayanappa and ors.
Karnataka
Vasudevamurthy, J.
Jan-13-1953
Commercial
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105; Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 52, 60, 61, 63 and 64; Mysore City Municipalities Act - Sections 41, 41(7), 251, 252 and 252(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 33; Limitation Act; Court-fees Act; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 21; Indian Contract Act - Sections 65
AIR1954Kant89; AIR1954Mys89; ILR1953KAR578; (1955)33MysLJ4
Vasudevamurthy, J1. The appellant was the plaintiff in the Court of the First Munsif of Bangalore. He brought a suit for a permanent injunction restraining the Bangalore City Municipality, either by itself or through its servants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParemajalu Chettiappa Vs. Pattangeri and ors.
Karnataka
Vasudevamurthy, J.
Jul-30-1954
Property
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 60, 62 and 76; Coorg Land Revenue Act - Sections 106, 106(4) and 145; Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 90; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 12 and 148; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 and 96
AIR1954Kant187; AIR1954Mys187
Vasudevamurthy, J1. The suit by the plaintiffs for redemption and possession of the plaint schedule lands has been decreed by the Court below and defendant 5 has come up in second appeal. The lands were mortgaged...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Nagendriah Vs. M. Ramachandriah and anr.
Karnataka
Medapa, C.J. and ;Vasudevamurthy, J.
Dec-05-1952
Civil
Indian Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7 and 11(B) - Schedule - Article 17; Mysore Court-fees Act, 1900 - Sechdule - Article 11B
AIR1953Kant108; AIR1953Mys108
Vasudevamurthy, J.1. The plaintiff brought a suit in the Court of the District Judge, Bangalore for a declaration that he is entitled to a half share in the plaint schedule properties and for being put in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskByappanahalli Muniamma Vs. Arale Chikkaveeranna and anr.
Karnataka
Medapa, C.J. and ;Vasudevamurthy, J.
Nov-26-1951
Trusts and Societies
Mysore Co-operative Societies Act, 1918 - Sections 43-A, 43-B and 43-C; Mysore Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Regulation, 1933; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 37 and 38; Mysore Land Revenue Code - Sections 221; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 95
AIR1952Kant105; AIR1952Mys105
Vasudevamurthy, J. 1. The Plaintiff, whose suit for a declaration, that a sale held by the Revenue authorities of the plaint schedule properties was a nullity, has been dismissed, has preferred this appeal. Her case is,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »