Advanced Search Results
Jayshree Vijay Mundaware Vs. The Principal/Head Mistress and Others
Mumbai
Anoop V. Mohta &Amp; V.L. Achliya
Jul-21-2015
Education
Anoop V. Mohta, J. 1. Main punctum is maintainability of the writ petition against an unaided private minority educational institution/school, at the instance of parents, whose children are expelled/debarred from the school/college of such institution, because...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Shri Balaji Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai Aurangabad
A.V. Nirgude &Amp; V.L. Achliya
Aug-09-2016
MRTP
Oral Judgment: (V.L. Achliya, J.) 1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of learned counsel for parties. 2. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEnercon GmbH and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai
Ranjit More &Amp; V.L. Achliya
Apr-05-2016
Land Acquisition
Oral Judgment: (V.L. Achliya, J.) 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, petition is heard finally at the stage of admission itself. 2. Petitioners herein have filed this petition under Article 226...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Colonel Anil Kumar Sharma Vs. Union of India, (through Secretary, Mini ...
Mumbai
Anoop V. Mohta &Amp; V.L. Achliya
Aug-26-2015
Land Acquisition
V. L. Achliya, J. 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, taken up for final disposal. 2 The Petitioner has challenged the order of transfer and posting dated 26th February 2015...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSayad Ismile and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai Aurangabad
A.V. Nirgude &Amp; V.L. Achliya
Aug-11-2016
Criminal
V.L. Achliya, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the Judgment and Order dt.23.11.2012 passed in Sessions Case No.25/2011 by Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai, Dist. Beed thereby convicting the appellants No.1 and 2 under Sections 302...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVicky Dilip Mutha and Others Vs. The Panjarapol Sanstha
Mumbai Aurangabad
A.V. Nirgude &Amp; V.L. Achliya
May-06-2016
Land Acquisition
V.L. Achliya, J. 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. With consent of parties, Petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 2. By the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSaraswati Education Society's Saraswati College of Engineering Vs. All ...
Mumbai
Anoop V. Mohta &Amp; V.L. Achliya
Aug-14-2015
Education
Anoop V. Mohta, J. 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties. 2. The Petitioners reliefs are based upon the following events: The Petitioners is an institution established in the year...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Sai Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Another
Mumbai Aurangabad
A.V. Nirgude &Amp; V.L. Achliya
Sep-27-2016
Land Acquisition
V.L. Achliya, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By the consent, heard finally at the admission stage. 2. Petitioner herein has preferred this petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishna and Another Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretar ...
Mumbai Aurangabad
S.S. Shinde &Amp; V.L. Achliya
Sep-09-2014
MRTP
S.S. Shinde,J. 1. Heard. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith with the consent of the Counsels for the parties. 3. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that, in one of the crime out of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaban Homaji Phadtare and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Othe ...
Mumbai
A.S. Oka &Amp; V.L. Achliya
Sep-11-2015
Land Acquisition
Oral Judgment: (A.S. Oka, J.) 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners and the learned AGP for the first to third Respondents. We have also heard the learned counsel appearing for the fourth Respondent. 2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »