Advanced Search Results
Empress of India Vs. Mula
Allahabad
Turner, J.
Dec-31-1969
Criminal
(1880)ILR2All105
Turner, J.1. The petitioner Mula is a money-lender in Shahjahanpur, with whom Chattar Singh, thakur, had had dealings, but prior to the date of the occurrence which led to the present charge Chattar had discharged his...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmpress of India Vs. Megha
Allahabad
Turner, J.
Dec-31-1969
Criminal
(1875)ILR1All637
Turner, J.1. I am unable to support, the enhanced sentence passed by the Judge under Section 75. That section declares that if any person having been confided of any offence punishable under certain parts of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmpress of India Vs. Budh Singh
Allahabad
Turner, J.
Dec-31-1969
Criminal
(1880)ILR2All101
Turner, J.1. It is found that the petitioner, in order to appropriate the wall of his neighbour, the complainant, to which he knew he had no right whatever, caused workmen to cut niches in the wall,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ajnasi Kuar Vs. Suraj Prasad
Allahabad
Robert Stuart, C.J. and ;Turner, J.
Dec-31-1969
Civil
(1875)ILR1All501
Turner, J.1. There is no evidence that there has been any interference on the part of the appellant with the return of her daughter to the respondent since the date of the decree. Something more must,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMusammat Jagesri Kuar Vs. Ram Nath Bhagat and anr.
Allahabad
Robert Stuart, C.J. and ;Turner, J.
Dec-31-1969
Civil
(1875)ILR1All371
1. We are of opinion that the present suit is maintainable. The Lords of the Privy Council* expressly except the case of a suit brought by a Hindu reversioner from the operation of the general rule.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHanwanta Vs. Darshan Singh and ors.
Allahabad
Robert Stuart, C.J. and Turner, J.
Dec-31-1969
Property
(1875)ILR1All274
1. Assuming that the instrument creates a charge on immoveable property, which may be doubted (see next case) it purports to create an interest over Rs. 100 in value, for it secured the repayment of Rs....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Mathra Parshad
Allahabad
Robert Stuart, C.J. and ;Turner, J.
Dec-31-1969
Civil
(1875)ILR1All296
ORDER1. It is obvious that the Subordinate Judge has misconceived the duty imposed on him. The circumstance that the decree, of which a review was sought, was passed by his predecessor did not discharge the Subordinate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaratib Ali Vs. Abdul Hakim and ors.
Allahabad
Robert Stuart, C.J. and ;Turner, J.
Dec-31-1969
Family
(1875)ILR1All567
ORDER1. The second plea is overruled because it was admitted that the existence of the right of pre-emption was entered in the record as a matter of agreement and not of custom, and on these averments...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeojit Vs. Pitambar and ors.
Allahabad
Robert Stuart, C.J. and Turner, J.
Dec-31-1969
Property
(1875)ILR1All275
1. This case differs widely from the one to which reference has been made Martin v. Pursram H.C.R. N.W.P. 1867 p. 124. If the debtors had described themselves as the owners of certain property and then...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGauri Shankar Vs. Manohar Lal
Allahabad
Robert Stuart, C.J. and ;Turner, J.
Dec-31-1969
Property
(1875)ILR1All476
1. The Act (XXXV of 1858) declares that when a person possessing such property is adjudged to he of unsound mind and incapable of managing his affairs, the Court of Wards 'shall be authorised to take...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »