Advanced Search Results
Emperor Vs. Nirmal Kanta Roy
Kolkata
Stephen, J.
Apr-01-1914
Criminal
AIR1914Cal901(2),(1914)ILR41Cal1072
Stephen, J.1. The accused in this case has been indicted under five counts. These are, first, the murder of Nripendra Nath Ghose under Sections 302 and 34 of the Penal Code; secondly, murder of the same...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGeorgucopulas Vs. Georgucopulas
Kolkata
Stephen, J.
Apr-29-1902
Family
(1902)ILR29Cal619
Stephen, J.1. In this case on the proceedings of divorce and petition for judicial separation the wife seeks to make her husband liable for her costs. The husband and wife in this case are Greeks, domiciled...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskProtap Chunder Dey Vs. Toolsey Dass Dey
Kolkata
Stephen, J.
Jul-01-1902
Arbitration
(1902)ILR29Cal793
Stephen, J.1. This is an, application to file an award made under the Arbitration Act of 1899. An objection has been taken to the award, and I have, been asked to remit it to the arbitrators....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jalim Singh Kotary Vs. Secretary of State for India
Kolkata
Stephen, J.
Jun-09-1904
Civil
(1904)ILR31Cal951
Stephen, J.1. This is a case in which the plaintiff sues the Secretary of State, as the authority responsible for the Eastern Bengal State Railway, for the value of four bales of piece-goods, which he delivered...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSarat Chandra Das Vs. Secretary of State for India in Council
Kolkata
Stephen, J.
Dec-16-1910
Education
9Ind.Cas.859
Stephen, J.1. This suit is brought by the plaintiff for a declaration that he is entitled to receive from the defendant payment of Rs. 300 a month for the rest of his life, and to recover...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNabinchandra Saha Paramanick Vs. Krishna Barana Dasi
Kolkata
Stephen, J.
Feb-09-1911
Property
(1911)ILR38Cal458
Stephen, J.1. This suit was originally decreed by me ex parte on the defendants failing to appear when the case was called on. Subsequently the defendants proved facts that led me to suppose that I might...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Chuni Lal Oswal
Kolkata
Stephen, J.
May-07-1902
Civil
(1902)ILR29Cal507
Stephen, J.1. The question now raised is whether witnesses appearing in accordance with an order made under Section 36 of the Insolvent Debtors Act, 1848, are entitled to be represented by Counsel. In an ordinary case...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBasanta Coomar Goswami Vs. Kumudini Dasee
Kolkata
Stephen, J.
Jan-31-1911
Civil
(1911)ILR38Cal428
Stephen, J.1. In this case I am asked to make an order upon the defendant to disclose certain documents and to allow inspection of them. The suit is one in which the plaintiff sues for commission...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahomed Shah Vs. Official Trustee of Bengal
Kolkata
Stephen, J.
Jan-25-1909
Civil
(1909)ILR36Cal431,2Ind.Cas.292
Stephen, J.1. The plaintiff in, this case sues to have it declared that he is the absolute owner of a certain Government promissory notes of the value of Rs. 37,500 now in the custody of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Chuni Lal Oswal
Kolkata
Stephen, J.
Apr-24-1902
Civil
(1902)ILR29Cal503
Stephen, J.1. In this case there is an order under Section 36 and a rule under Section 26. It is argued that both of these are bad. In the first place, it is said that proceedings...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »