Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Judge: siddharth mridul j · Page 1 of about 10 results (0.030 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 22 2008

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Narender Kumar Aggarwal

Court : Delhi

Judge : Siddharth Mridul, J.

Decided on : Oct-22-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 5(2) and 7(3A); Central Civil Services Pension Rules, 1972

Reported in : 155(2008)DLT160; [2007(115)FLR1148]

Siddharth Mridul, J.1. These 31 petitions are filed on behalf of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (in short 'Corporation') assailing the orders passed by the Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (in short...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 2008

Anand Prakash Vs. Godrej Sara Lee Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Judge : Siddharth Mridul, J.

Decided on : Nov-20-2008

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2009(121)FLR327]

Siddharth Mridul, J. 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the validity of the award dated 20th May, 2005 passed by the Labour Court-VII, Delhi, whereby the Tribunal dismissed the claim of the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 10 2008

Tobu Enterprises Limited Vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal an ...

Court : Delhi

Judge : Siddharth Mridul, J.

Decided on : Nov-10-2008

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections I(1) and 25(O); Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Central Rules, 1946 - Rule 14(3)

Reported in : 160(2009)DLT125

Siddharth Mridul, J.1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prays for, inter alia, a direction to quash the Award dated 12th September, 2000 passed by the Industrial Adjudicator whereby the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 31 2010

H.B. Chaturvedi Vs. C.B.i.

Court : Delhi

Judge : Siddharth Mridul, J.

Decided on : May-31-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Section 391; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 437, 437(1), 437(3), 439 and 439(1); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 420, 468 and 478; ;Constitution of India - Article 21

Siddharth Mridul, J.1. This is a petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) for grant of bail in the case registered vide RC No. BDI/2009 E 0005 under Section 120B read with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 2011

Cit Vs. Sumangal Overseas Ltd

Court : Delhi

Judge : Siddharth Mridul, J.

Decided on : Nov-18-2011

Subject : Income Tax

Acts : Income Tax Act - Sections 271(1)(c), 36(1)(vii), 36(2), 28

1. Penalty of `73,85,322/- imposed upon the respondent assessee by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) was affirmed by the CIT (A). However, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 2011

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Harnarain

Court : Delhi

Judge : Siddharth Mridul, J.

Decided on : Oct-31-2011

Subject : Income Tax

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1962 - Sections 260A, 132

1. The present Appeal filed by the Department under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) was admitted on the following substantial question of law:-"Whether the ITAT could have...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 2011

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Delhi Public School

Court : Delhi

Judge : Siddharth Mridul, J.

Decided on : Oct-31-2011

Subject : Income Tax

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 201(1A); Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 3(5)

1. Appeals of the Revenue are admitted on the following substantial question of law:"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned ITAT erred in holding that Assessee was not in default...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 2010

Thounaojam Shyamkumar Singh Vs State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Judge : Mr .Siddharth Mridul, J.

Decided on : Jun-03-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 2004 - Sections 18,19,20 ; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - 120(B) ;

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes.ORDER. (ORAL)1. This is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2010

Uoi Vs S.S.Bansal

Court : Delhi

Judge : Mr. Pradeep Nandrajog ; Mr. Siddharth Mridul. J J.

Decided on : Oct-25-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?ORDER.1. Vide impugned order dated 15.12.2008, allowing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 2008

Jagat Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Judge : Acting C.J. and; Siddharth Mridul, J.

Decided on : Apr-09-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5A, 6, 17(1) and 17(4)

Reported in : 2008(103)DRJ651

Acting C.J.1. A large extent of land measuring nearly 16000 bighas situated in different parts of Delhi were notified for acquisition for the public purpose of planned development of Delhi in terms of a preliminary notification...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial