Advanced Search Results
Maharaja Bhagwatsingh of Udaipur Vs. Maharana Bhopal Electric Supply C ...
Rajasthan
P.N. Shinghal, J.
Dec-02-1968
Electricity
Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 23, 57 and 57(2); Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3
AIR1970Raj72
P.N. Shinghal, J. 1. As both the Courts below have dismissed the suit of the plaintiff, he has preferred the present second appeal which arises from the appellate judgment and decree of the District Judge of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohan Vs. State
Rajasthan
P.N. Shinghal, J.
Jan-14-1974
CriminalFood Adulteration
1974WLN(UC)163
P.N. Shinghal, J.1. Heard learned counsel. The petitioner has been convicted and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for six months and a fine of Rs. 500/- Under Section 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGaneshilal Gupta Vs. Bharatpur Oil Mills Through Official Liquidator
Rajasthan
P.N. Shinghal, J.
Feb-04-1972
Company
1972WLN68
P.N. Shinghal, J.1. This is an application of Ganeshilal, one of the ex-Directors Bharatpur Oil Mills (P) Ltd., for relief under Rule 177 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'. An...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Pyarelal Premi Vs. Director of Education (Primary and Secondary) and o ...
Rajasthan
P.N. Shinghal, J.
Aug-28-1972
Service
1972WLN618
P.N. Shinghal, J.1. The petitioner was appointed as a Senior Teacher in English for Multi-purpose and Higher Secondary Schools, by order Ex. 3 dated July 22, 1957. along with several others. It was an appointment on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Mahalaxmi Tent Factory, Jodhpur Vs. Kamla Devi and ors.
Rajasthan
P.N. Shinghal, J.
Mar-04-1974
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 121, 122 and 128(1) - Order 18, Rules 5 and 19
AIR1975Raj13; 1974(7)WLN295
ORDERP.N. Shinghal, J. 1. These revision petitions relate to the validity of the amendments which have been made in Orders XVIII and XXVI of the Code of Civil Procedure, hereinafter referred to as 'the Code', by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFirm Sitaram Agarwal Vs. Harnath and anr.
Rajasthan
P.N. Shinghal, J.
Feb-25-1969
Civil
Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 58, 59 and 69(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 23, Rule 1(2)
AIR1970Raj99; 1969()WLN91
P.N. Shinghal, J. 1. This second appeal is by the plaintiff who has been unsuccessful in both the courts below.2. The two courts below have not gone into the merits of the controversy regarding the claim...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSukanraj Vs. Nekarchand
Rajasthan
P.N. Shinghal, J.
Oct-12-1968
Tenancy
Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 49; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106 and 114; Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 to 101
AIR1970Raj17
P.N. Shinghal, J. 1. The plaintiff and the defendant have filed appeals against the appellate judgment and decree or the CivilJudge of Jalore dated October 7, 1965. The plaintiffs appeal is No. 41 of 1966, while...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Swayambar Prasad Sudrania Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.
Rajasthan
P.N. Shinghal, J.
Apr-09-1971
ServiceConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 16 and 226; Rajasthan Service (Collegiate Branch) Rules, 1963 - Rule 30(2)
AIR1972Raj69; 1971(4)WLN187
ORDERP.N. Shinghal, J. 1. Petitioner Dr. S. P. Sudrania passed the M. B- B. S. examination in 1962 and joined the service of the Rajasthan State as Civil Assistant Surgeon on February 28. 1964. He was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVishweshwarlal Vs. Bhuramal and anr.
Rajasthan
P.N. Shinghal, J.
Feb-05-1968
FamilyProperty
Hindu Law
AIR1968Raj277
P.N. Shinghal, J.1. The plaintiff-appellant feels aggrieved by the appellate judgment of the District Judge of Bikaner, dated November 13, 1961, by which his suit has been dismissed2. The facts are quite simple and are not...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGulab Devi Vs. Bhagwan Sahai
Rajasthan
P.N. Shinghal, J.
Nov-17-1970
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 18, Rule 1
AIR1971Raj240; 1970(3)WLN616
ORDERP.N. Shinghal, J.1. This revision, application of the plaintiff is directed against the order of Additional Munsiff No. 1, Jaipur City, dated May 27, 1968, by which he refused to permit the plaintiff's learned counsel to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »