Advanced Search Results
Pandurang S/O Tukaram Shinde Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai Aurangabad
S.S. Shinde, J.
Jan-28-2011
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 325; Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3(1)(x)
1. The appellant herein was tried by the Special Judge, Beed for an offence punishable under Section 325 of I.P.C. in Sessions Case No. 53 of 1998 and by his judgment and order dated 25th June,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandrasen S/O Kisanrao Chauhan Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.
Mumbai Aurangabad
S. S. Shinde, J.
Mar-04-2011
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 13(1)(d)(i) (ii), 7, 12 (1) (d), 13(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Sections 107, 152, 313
:-1. This appeal is filed challenging the judgment and order of conviction dated 01.03.1999, passed by the learned Special Judge, Beed, in Special Case No.55 of 1991 whereby the learned Special Judge has convicted the appellant-accused...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijay S/O Mohan Jagtap Vs. Sau.Sindhubai Mohanrao Jagtap and ors.
Mumbai Aurangabad
S.S.Shinde, J.
Sep-22-2011
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 23 Rule 3, Section 17; Bombay Court Fees Act - Section 46.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of learned Counsel for respective parties. Learned Counsel Mrs.Deshmukh waives service of Rule on behalf of Respondents No.1 &...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sow Laxmibai W/O Marotirao Savant Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai Aurangabad
S. S. Shinde, J.
Feb-18-2011
Criminal
Code Of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) - Section 313; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 366A
:1. This appeal is preferred by the appellant/original accused against the judgment and order of conviction dated 20.02.1999 passed by the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No. 278/1995 thereby convicting the appellant for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunil Mulchand Jain. Vs. Smt. Purnima Prakash Kulkarni and ors.
Mumbai
S. S. Shinde, J.
Oct-20-2011
Land Acquisition
JUDGMENT : 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the present matter is taken up for hearing and final disposal at the stage of admission itself. . This...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunita W/O Baliram Pande Vs. Baliram S/O Haribhau Pande
Mumbai Aurangabad
S.S. Shinde, J.
Aug-18-2011
Family
Hindu Marriage Act - Section 13; Domestic Violence Act - Sections 18, 19, 20 and 22
Top of Form 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, heard finally. 2. This Misc. Civil Application is filed praying therein, the transfer of the proceedings of Hindu Marriage Petition No. 232 of 2010 filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Gumfabai Dattalal Jaiswal and anr. Vs. Suresh Laxminarayan Jaiswa ...
Mumbai Aurangabad
S.S.Shinde, J.
Aug-09-2011
Tenancy
Hyderabad Houses (Rent, Eviction and Lease) Control Act, 1954 - Section 15 (2), 12(2)
1) Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2) This Civil Revision Application is filed challenging the judgment and order dated 1st October, 2009, passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Nanded in HRCA No.1/2007,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Parbhani Zilla Dekhrekh Sahakari Sanstha Ltd. Through Its Chief Ex ...
Mumbai
S.S. Shinde, J.
Aug-17-2009
Labour and Industrial
Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 4(5), 7, 7(4), 7(7) and 8; Limitation Act - Sections 5
(2010)ILLJ631Bom
S.S. Shinde, J.1. These Writ Petitions are filed challenging the Judgment and Order dated 10/5/2006 by the Assistant Labour Commissioner and Controlling authority, Nanded under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (for short 'the Act') in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri. Nandkishor Kanhyalal Agrawal Vs. Dhule Municipal Corporation and ...
Mumbai Aurangabad
S.S. Shinde, J.
Sep-09-2011
Civil
Limitation Act - Section 14, 5; Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (5 of 1908) - Order 9, 33 Rule 13, 2; Amendment Act - Section 32(2)(i), 115
1. This Civil Revision Application takes exception to the order dated 17-01-1005 passed by the 2nd Adhoc Additional District Judge, Dhule in Civil M.A. No. 89 of 2003. 2. The background facts leading to file this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Executive Engineer, Nashik Irrigation Division Vs. Shri Gulab Begu ...
Mumbai
S.S. Shinde, J.
Oct-06-2009
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(S), 10, 25B, 25F, 25G, 25H and 25(OO)(BB); Limitation Act; Maharashtra Recognition of of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971; Maharashtra Recognition of of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Rules - Rule 81; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6P and 6N; Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 - Rules 80 and 81; I.D.A (Bombay) Rules, 1947 - Rules 80 and 81; Constitution of India - Article 227
2009(111)BomLR4451
S.S. Shinde, J.1. These petitions are filed challenging the common judgment and award dated 13/14th July, 2004 passed by the Labour Court, Ahmednagar in Reference (IDA) Nos. 296, 297, 298, 299, 374 AND 375 OF 1994.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »