Advanced Search Results

Chowgule Brothers Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Judge : S T C., K Kumar

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2003)(153)ELT331Tri(Mum.)bai

1. Shri Kunal Shah, learned Advocate for the appellants states that the appellants are the agents for the master of the vessel "Sea Transporter" which ran aground off Fort Aguada, Goa in June, 1994 when a...

Shri Balaji Lining Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Judge : K Usha, S T C.

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2002)(146)ELT460TriDel

1. This appeal is against the order-in-appeal, dated 26-2-2002 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), New Delhi.2. We have heard the learned Advocate for the appellants and the learned SDR on the stay application...

New Kishan Cement Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Judge : A Wadhwa, S T C.

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2004)(169)ELT116Tri(Mum.)bai

1. Heard both sides. The appellants have been denied benefit of the small-scale exemption on the ground that they are using the same brand name i.e. 'KISHAN CEMENT' which is allegedly used by another manufacturer. The...

Krishak Bharati Co-op. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Judge : K Kumar, S T C.

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2004)(176)ELT678Tri(Mum.)bai

1. Heard both sides. The demands are in respect of treated water, demineralised water as well as the inputs used in the production of steam. Such water and steam are supplied to the Heavy Water Plant...

Hada Textiles Industries Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Judge : A Wadhwa, S T C.

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2003)(109)LC222Tri(Kol.)kata

1. The appellants were manufacturing single ply cotton yarn which they were consuming captively for the manufacture of double ply cotton yarn.The said double ply cotton yarn was being cleared by them on payment of duty....

Lallubhai Amichand Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cen. Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Judge : J Balasundaram, S T C.

Subject : Excise

1. For reasons recorded below, we waive the pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 39,93,261.00 and penalty of amount equal to duty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and penalty of Rs. 2...

Emmes Metal Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Judge : S T C.

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2003)(161)ELT1041Tri(Mum.)bai

1. Heard both sides. In pursuance of the Tribunal Order Nos.CI/3816-17/WZB/2001, dated 13-12-2001 [2002 (145) E.L.T. 234 (Tribunal)], the appellants were required to produce a copy of re-constructed bill of entry before the Assistant Commissioner to...

Nicholas Piramal India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Judge : K Kumar, S T C.

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2003)(158)ELT342Tri(Mum.)bai

1. After hearing both sides for some time, we find that the appeal itself can be disposed of at the stay stage itself. As such, we waive the pre-deposit of duty and penalty and proceeded to...

Sarvodaya Lab, K.B. Rathi, R.A. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Judge : K Kumar, S T C.

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (2004)(167)ELT105Tri(Mum.)bai

1. Non-Appeared for the appellants despite notice and adjournments granted ealier. Heard Shri U.B. Khalwadekar, learned D.R. The Revenue.This is a case which involves import of goods under DEEC Scheme and sale of the same is...

Aurangabad Paper Mills Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Judge : S T C.

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2004)(113)LC775Tri(Mum.)bai

1. Heard both sides and perused the case records. The appellants have been denied the modvat credit on the following items: The claim of the appellants for credit on felt and wire mesh is supported by...