Advanced Search Results
Vijay Krishna Kumbhar Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai
B.N. Srikrishna and; S.S. Parkar, JJ.
Mar-15-1999
Tenancy Property
Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 22, 23(1), 26, 28, 29, 31, 37, 38, 44, 45, 47, 49, 51, 58, 59 to 112, 125, 126, 127, 128 to 151, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157 and 158; Constitution of India - Articles 13-010, 19(1), 19-045, 133, 141, 166(3) and 226; Development Control Rules, 1982 - Rules 1.3, 5, 6.1.1 and 13.5; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1931; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 12-A, 18 and 54; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 22; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37-I and 269(UA); Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 3 to 20, 21 to 58, 159, 253, 254, 255 and 481; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1951 - Sections 1 to 7; Bombay Village Panchayat Act, Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 40, 41, 42, 43, 46, 51 and 52;
2000(2)BomCR293
ORDERB.N. Srikrishna, J.1. These two petitions are in the nature of public interest litigation, the first at the instance of a journalist from Pune and the second at the instance of a Corporator of Pune Municipal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Bhagirathi Jyotiram Kale, Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
S.S. Parkar and ;Anoop V. Mohta, JJ.
Mar-14-2005
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313
I(2006)DMC36
Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. The appellants -accused Nos. 1 to 3 were charged, tried and convicted of the offence under Section 498A(a) and (b) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC'),...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGopi Khema Rathod Vs. Commissioner of Police and anr.
Mumbai
S.S. Parkar and ;R.S. Mohite, JJ.
Aug-30-2004
Criminal
Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons (Amendment) Act, 1996 - Sections 2; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 143, 147, 332, 336, 337 and 353
2005CriLJ823; 2004(4)MhLj1001
S.S. Parkar, J.1. The petitioner has challenged in this petition his detention under the provisions of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons (Amendment) Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Wilberg Peter Torbjorn FlorentIn Vs. Inspector of Customs, Mumbai and ...
Mumbai
S.S. Parkar and ;Ranjana Desai, JJ.
Aug-31-2001
NarcoticsCriminal
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 42, 50, 53 and 67; Evidence Act - Sections 164
2002(3)MhLj123
S.S. Parkar, J.1. All the above appeals arise against the judgment and order dated 22-4-1996 delivered by the Special Judge in NDPS Special Case No. 107 of 1994. In all four accused were prosecuted for the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs. Nakshatram Kanakraj Nadar Vs. the Commissioner of Police and anr.
Mumbai
S.S. Parkar and ;Ranjana Desai, JJ.
Jul-16-2004
Criminal
Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Sections 2 and 3(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 390, 395 and 397; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 4, 25(1) and 35; Bombay Police Act - Sections 135; Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985
2005(1)MhLj465
S.S. Parkar, J.1. This petition has been filed by the wife of the detenu, Kanakraj Pal Nadar, who was detained under the provisions of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Mohd. Ayub AlimuddIn Shaikh @ Chikana Ayub Vs. Shri M.N. Singh an ...
Mumbai
S.S. Parkar and ;V.K. Tahilramani, JJ.
Jan-06-2004
Criminal
Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 392, 394, 395, 397, 399 and 402; Arms Act
2004(4)MhLj303
S.S. Parkar, J.1. By this petition the petitioner challenges the order of detention issued under the provisions of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981.2. The impugned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKirti Kumar Narulla Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
S.S. Parkar and ;Ranjana Desai, JJ.
Mar-24-2004
CriminalConstitution
Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 8; Constitution of India - Article 22(4) and 22(5); Customs Act - Sections 24
2004(3)MhLj505
S.S. Parkar, J.1. This petition is filed challenging the order of detention dated 18th January 2003 issued against the Rajinder Narula under the provisions of Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnil Kesarinath Patil Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai
D.K. Trivedi and; S.S. Parkar, JJ.
Jun-30-1997
CustomsCriminal
Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1); Constitution of India - Article 22(5)
1998BomCR(Cri)181
ORDERS.S. Parkar, J.1. By this petition the petitioner has challenged the detention of his cousin by name Sandeep P. Patil under the provisions of the COFEPOSA Act. The impugned order of detention annexed as Annexure 'A'...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYakub Ebrahim Patel @ Yakub Vs. S.H. Shool and ors.
Mumbai
S.S. Parkar and ;V.K. Tahilramani, JJ.
Jan-07-2003
Criminal
Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 - Sections 3(1)
2003BomCR(Cri)839; 2003CriLJ1167; 2003(3)MhLj27
S.S. Parkar, J.1. By this petition the petitioner-detenu has challenged the order of detention passed against him under the provisions of Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988. 2. The petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Satnam Ahuja Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai
S.S. Parkar, J.
Dec-02-1997
Criminal
Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 73 to 75; Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 - Sections 11 and 35; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 200 and 202
1998(5)BomCR43; 1998CriLJ1952; 1998(3)MhLj245
ORDERS.S. Parkar, J.1. Rule. By consent rule is made returnable forthwith. The learnedCounsel for the respondents waive service. Heard the Counsel for the parties at length.2. The petition challenges the order dated 21st November, 1997, passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »