Advanced Search Results
Smt. Krishna Pati Devi ors. Vs. the State of Bihar ors.
Patna
B.M. Lal, C.J. and S.K. Singh, J.
Jul-16-1998
Civil
1. This L.P.A. is directed against the order dated 23.4.1998. Shri Rajendra Prasad Singh appears on behalf of the appellants and Junior Counsel to Standing Counsel No. 7 Shri Praveen Kumar appears on behalf of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKumar Gandhrva and ors. Vs. Principal, M.M.M. Engg. College and ors.
Allahabad
S.K. Singh, J.
Dec-04-2002
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 14
2003(1)AWC226
S.K. Singh, J. 1. The prayer in this petition is for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to permit the petitioners to appear in the examination of IInd Semester of B....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBans Raj Singh and ors. Vs. Ist Addl. District Judge, Varanasi and ors ...
Allahabad
S.K. Singh, J.
Sep-17-2001
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 96(2) and 151
2001(4)AWC2833
S.K. Singh, J.1. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the Judgment of the respondent No. 1 dated 30.4.1992 (Annexure-8 to the writ petition). Ram Ujagir Singh and Jagannath filed suit No. 665...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sanjiv Kumar Singh and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Patna
S.K. Singh, J.
Aug-05-1999
Criminal
1999(3)BLJR2127
1. Heard the parties.2. In this case, petitioners obtained settlement of lands for the purpose of cultivation under the orders of Subdivisional Magistrate, Manjhaul in course of a proceeding under Sections 145 and 146(1), Cr. P.C....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRavindra Nath Singh Vs. State of Bihar and anr.
Patna
S.K. Singh, J.
Feb-04-2002
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 110; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482
S.K. Singh, J.1. Heard the parties.2. Petitioner is an accused in a criminal case which was filed by opposite party No. 2. The allegations are to the effect that complainant owns Swaraj Tractor bearing registration No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJitendra Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
S.K. Singh, J.
Feb-04-2003
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226
2003(2)AWC1002
ORDERS.K. Singh, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. 2. In view of the facts and circumstances, submissions as made and the relief as is being claimed in this petition, it...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Premo Devi and ors. Vs. Joint Director of Consolidation and anr.
Allahabad
S.K. Singh, J.
Apr-04-2003
Limitation
Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 9A(2), 11 and 48
2003(3)AWC1780
S.K. Singh, J.1. By means of the present writ petition, petitioners have prayed for issuance of the writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the judgment and order passed by Jt. Director of Consolidation, Mujaffarnagar/respondent No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKaushlesh NaraIn Singh and ors. Vs. Upper Ayukt, Pratham Mandal and or ...
Allahabad
S.K. Singh, J.
Apr-17-2003
Civil
2003(3)AWC2578
ORDERS. K. Singh, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel. As the pleading between the parties are complete, as prayed, matter is being heard and finally decided.2. Challenged in this petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Nagina Singh Vs. U.P. Khadi Evam Gram Udyog Board and ors.
Allahabad
S.K. Singh, J.
Apr-04-2003
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Khadi and Village Industries Board Act, 1960
2003(3)AWC2410
S.K. Singh, J.1. By means of present writ petition petitioner has challenged the order dated 24.2.2003 (Annexure-3 to the writ petition) passed by Prashashak/Mantri, Kshetriya Shri Gandhi Ashram, Maghar (Sant Kabir Nagar) by which petitioner has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPalak Dhari (D) Through L.Rs. Vs. Commissioner, Consolidation and ors.
Allahabad
S.K. Singh, J.
Apr-30-2003
Civil
Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 11
2003(4)AWC2773
ORDERS. K. Singh, J.1. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel, who appeared for the respondents.2. Present writ petition is directed against the orders passed by the Consolidation Commissioner/ respondent No. 1 dated 7.5,1992...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »