Advanced Search Results
Sheela Foam Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
K Usha, S Kang, N T C.N.B.
May-01-2003
MRTP
(2003)(154)ELT381TriDel
1. The appellant in appeal No. E/1341/2001-A which was allowed by this Tribunal by Final Order dated 12-2-2002 filed a Miscellaneous Applications Nos. E/M/389, 390 & 391/2002-A on 23-10-2002 seeking directions to the respondent to implement...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSheela Foam Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
K Usha, S Kang, N T C.N.B.
May-30-2003
MRTP
(2003)(88)ECC249
1. Pursuant to the directions given vide Misc. Order dated 1-5-2003, the Commissioner of Central Excise, Ghaziabad, has filed an affidavit dated 26-5-2003. We are afraid that the above affidavit is inadequate.2. Issue involved, herein, is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFrick India Ltd. Vs. C.C.E.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
K Usha, S Kang, N T C.N.B.
Aug-26-2003
Excise
(2001)(78)ECC303
1. These are the applications filed by the appellants in appeal nos.E/1151/2000-NB(A) and E/1192/2000-NB(A) seeking a direction to the respondents to refund an amount of Rs one crore paid by the applicants as pre-deposit pursuant to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M.M. Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
S Peeran, N T C.N.B.
Jul-10-2000
Land Acquisition
(2000)(72)ECC864
1. The dispute is in relation to payment of duty by Re-rolling mills based on Capacity of Production.2. Ld. Counsel for appellants submits that stay application filed is infructuous as the amount in dispute has already...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFerro Alloys Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
S Peeran, N T C.N.B.
Jul-11-2000
Excise
(2000)(71)ECC531
1. Both the stay applications pertained to the same assessee which arise from two different orders passed by Commissioner (Appeals) dismissing both the appeals under provisions of Section 35F of the Act for non-compliance of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommr. of Customs Vs. Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
S Peeran, N T C.N.B.
Jul-13-2000
Excise
(2000)(72)ECC838
1. The case is posted today for consideration of Condonation of Delay filed-by the Revenue.The Revenue has explained the delay through Affidavit and condonation is not opposed by the respondent. Accordingly, the application for condonation of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOlympia Electronics (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
S Peeran, N T C.N.B.
Mar-07-2001
Service Tax
(2001)(76)ECC654
1. This appeal arises from Order-in-Appeal No. M.Cus.1086/96 dated 3.7.96 passed by Commissioner (Appeals), Chennai holding that the demand notice had been despatched to the Clearing Agent and hence it is deemed to be served on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssociation of Bopp Vs. Designated Authority
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
K Usha, S Kang, N T C.N.B.
Apr-07-2003
Land Acquisition
(2003)(154)ELT384TriDel
1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 20 days in filing of appeal. It is submitted that delay has caused due to non-availability of Chief Executives of the Industries who are members of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParshant Glass Works (P) Ltd. Vs. Cc
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
K Usha, S Kang, N T C.N.B.
Jun-10-2003
Other Taxes
(2003)(88)ECC488
1. Pursuant to the order passed by us dated 22.4.2003 the Commissioner of Customs has filed an affidavit. In paragraph 14 he states as follows: "That at the material period, a number of officers were posted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndia Cements Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
K Usha, S Kang, N T C.N.B.
Jun-10-2003
Land Acquisition
(2003)(155)ELT260TriDel
1. In the affidavit filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem it is submitted that the department was under bona fide impression that once reference petition is filed, the order passed by this Tribunal will...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »