Advanced Search Results
Gajraj Tiwari Vs. Kunti and ors.
Allahabad
Walsh, Acting C.J. and ;Ryves, J.
May-27-1924
Civil
(1924)ILR46All847
Walsh, Acting C.J. and Ryves, J.1. In our view this decision cannot be upheld. The point is one which has been very much discussed in a variety of forms in which it arises, but the differences...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSalt Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Holmwood and ;Ryves, J.
Jan-21-1909
Criminal
(1909)ILR36Cal560,2Ind.Cas.591
Holmwood and Ryves, JJ.1. We are of opinion that the best way of dealing with this Rule will be to direct that the learned Sessions Judge who heard the appeal should reconsider it after re-hearing counsel...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmperor Vs. Santi Lal and anr.
Allahabad
Ryves, J.
Sep-17-1919
Criminal
(1920)ILR42All130
Ryves, J.1. This is an application in revision, asking this Court to quash a commitment to the Court of Session under Section 466 of the Indian Penal Code. It appears that the applicant applied to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Emperor Vs. Maqsud HusaIn and anr.
Allahabad
Ryves, J.
Apr-11-1923
Criminal
(1923)ILR45All529
Ryves, J.1. Maqsud Husain and Musammat Allahbandi were convicted by a Magistrate of the first class, under Section 297 of the Indian Penal Code. Their appeal was rejected by the learned. Sessions Judge and they have...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskReoti Ram Vs. Lallu Mal
Allahabad
Ryves, J.
May-31-1923
Limitation
(1923)ILR45All679
Ryves, J.1. This is a civil revision from a decree of the court of Small Causes. The suit was based on a promissory-note executed by the defendant on the 16th of April, 1919. The suit was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLachmi NaraIn and ors. Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Ryves, J.
Nov-11-1919
Service Tax
AIR1920All357; 54Ind.Cas.494
Ryves, J.1. In this case a number of directors of the Kharidar Kapra Company, Limited, Cawnpore, were tried for an offence under Section 76 of the Indian Companies Act, and convicted and ordered to pay a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDukhi Ram Barai Vs. B.N.W. Railway
Allahabad
Ryves, J.
Nov-23-1922
Civil
AIR1923All145; 73Ind.Cas.440
Ryves, J.1. This is an application in civil revision filed by the plaintiff to set aside the decree of the Judge of the Small Cause Court at Azamgarh. Two consignments of betel leaves were delivered to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhola Nath, Debi Das Vs. Great Indian Peninsula Railway Company
Allahabad
Ryves, J.
Jul-07-1922
Civil
(1923)ILR45All56
Ryves, J.1. This suit was brought by the consignee of two bales of yarn despatched from Bombay to a station of the Great Indian Peninsula Railway to recover the value of one of the bales which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmperor Vs. Ram Lochan and ors.
Allahabad
Ryves, J.
Dec-06-1913
Criminal
(1914)ILR36All143
Ryves, J.1. This is an application in revision from an order purporting to have been passed under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Azamgarh, dated the 3rd of July,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmperor Vs. Azmat Shah Khan and ors.
Allahabad
Ryves, J.
Apr-13-1913
Criminal
(1913)ILR35All374
Ryves, J.1. On the facts found in this case I cannot interfere with the conviction. But I think that the sentence, even as modified by the learned Sessions Judge, is under the circumstances of the case...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »