Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Judge: roy j · Page 1 of about 933 results (0.049 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 10 2006

Sarala Bala Roy Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Judge : Hrishikesh Roy, J.

Decided on : Nov-10-2006

Subject : Property

Hrishikesh Roy, J.1. This appeal brought before this court under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 hereinafter referred to as the 'Act' read with Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is against...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 1983

Baidyanath Basak and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Judge : Manashnath Roy, J.

Decided on : Jun-03-1983

Subject : Customs

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19, 20, 20(1), 20(2), 20(3), 21, 22 and 22(1); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193, 228, 323, 330, 426 and 448; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 161(1), 161(2), 175, 218, 219, 219(1), 220, 221 and 223; ;Customs Ordinance - Section 116; ;Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 8, 8(1), 34, 35, 71, 71(1), 71(2) 74, 123(1) and 123(2); ;Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108, 111, 112, 119, 121, 123, 124, 127, 135, 136, 136(1), 136(2) and 145(2); ;Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 167(1), 167(3), 167(8), 167(81), 171A, 178A, 182 and 186; ;Forgien Exchange Regulation Act - Section 23; ;Evidence Act - Sections 2, 21, 24 and 132; ;General Clauses Act - Sections 3(38), 26; ;Gold (Control) Rules; ;Gold (Control) Orders

Reported in : 1986(9)ECC109,1988(17)LC781(Calcutta),1987(30)ELT198(Cal)

Manashnath Roy, J.1. On or about 30th March, 1972, Customs Officers appeared and searched premises No. 35, Nalini Seth Road, Calcutta. It has been alleged that the said officers searched the concerned premises after breaking open...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 1983

Baidyanath Basak and Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Judge : Manashnath Roy, J.

Decided on : Jun-03-1983

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1983CriLJ1542

ORDERManashnath Roy, J.1. On or about 30th March 1972, Customs Officers appeared and searched premises No. 35, Nalini Seth Road, Calcutta. It has been alleged that the said officers searched the concerned premises after breaking open...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 02 1980

Abdul Latif Mullick and ors. Vs. Special Land Acquisition Collector an ...

Court : Kolkata

Judge : Manas Nath Roy, J.

Decided on : Sep-02-1980

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 2, 4 and 6; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 21; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1981Cal395,85CWN148

ORDERManas Nath Roy, J.1. By a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), lands in full and in Plots Nos. 1376 and 1377. Jurisdiction List No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 1970

Hind Ceramics Ltd. Vs. Company Law Board and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Judge : K.L. Roy, J.

Decided on : Aug-04-1970

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 198(1), 198(4), 309, 309(4) and 310

Reported in : [1972]42CompCas610(Cal)

K.L. Roy, J.1. The petitioner-company has a paid up share capital of Rs. 6,25,000 consisting of 6,250 shares of Rs. 100 each. The company is a director controlled company. Some time in 1965, M/s. Dalmia Cement...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 21 1963

V.K. Godhwani and anr. Vs. State and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Judge : Amaresh Roy, J.

Decided on : Jun-21-1963

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4(1), 492, 492(2) and 494; ;Constitution of India - Article 166(2)

Reported in : AIR1965Cal79

ORDERAmaresh Roy, J.1. This Rule was issued by my learned brother Niyogi, J. on November 5, 1962, upon an application for revision made in this Court on behalf of two accused persons V.K. Godhwani and Bahadur...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1984

Chandan Kumar Mukherjee Vs. Sakur Banu Mullick

Court : Kolkata

Judge : M.N. Roy, J.

Decided on : Apr-19-1984

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Sections 2 and 13(1)

Reported in : AIR1984Cal236

ORDERM.N. Roy, J.1. The tenant, defendant/petitioner obtained this Rule with the corresponding interim order on 6th July 1981, against the landlord, plaintiff/opposite party for quashing and setting aside, Order No. 52dated 2nd June 1981, passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 1986

Everett (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Customs

Court : Kolkata

Judge : Sudhir Ranjan Roy, J.

Decided on : Apr-01-1986

Subject : CustomsConstitution

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25 and 116; ;Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Section 3; ;Central Provinces and Berar Municipal Act

Reported in : 1986(9)ECC131,1986(24)ELT469(Cal)

Sudhir Ranjan Roy, J.1. These three writ applications are taken up for analogous hearing since they involve a common question of law.2. All the three applications arose out of penalty proceedings under Section 116 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 1982

Kantilal Somehand Shah and anr. Vs. Collector of Customs and Central E ...

Court : Kolkata

Judge : Manasnath Roy, J.

Decided on : Jun-03-1982

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 21, 104, 110, 110(1), 110(2), 111, 112, 123, 124, 124(4), 128, 128(2), 130, 130(1), 130(2), 131, 137 and 139(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Bombay Co-operative Societies Act - Section 54; ;Bombay Co-operative Societies Rules - Rule 37; ;Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 180A and 188; ;Income Tax Act, 1922

Reported in : 1985(4)ECC41,1982(10)ELT902(Cal)

ORDERManasnath Roy, J.1. The petitioners have claimed to be partners of the registered partnership firm M/s. Kantilal Chandulal and Company (hereinafter referred to as the said firm) which had and has the official place of business...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 2006

Ranjit Bhattacharjee Vs. State of Tripura and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Judge : Hrishikesh Roy, J.

Decided on : Nov-22-2006

Subject : Service

Hrishikesh Roy, J.1. In the two writ petitions which are being disposed of by the present judgment, three writ petitioners who are working as physical instructors of Government colleges in the State of Tripura have claimed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial