Advanced Search Results
Rupesh Kumar Meena versus Union of India & Others
Supreme Court of India
Rajesh Bindal
Feb-04-2026
Land Acquisition
[2026] 2 S.C.R. 362
[2026] 2 S.C.R. 362 : 2026 INSC 119 Rupesh Kumar Meena v. Union of India & Others (Civil Appeal No(s). 11302-11303 of 2016) 04 February 2026 [Rajesh Bindal* and Atul S. Chandurkar, JJ.]Issue for ConsiderationWhether the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAman Shiv Mandir Trust (Regd.) Vs. Cit
Punjab and Haryana
M.M. Kumar and; Rajesh Bindal, JJ.
Mar-26-2007
Direct Taxation
(2007)213CTR(P& H)466; [2008]296ITR415(P& H)
ORDERRajesh Bindal, J. 1. This append has been preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') proposing the following substantial questions of law arising out of order dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNand Kishore and Company Vs. State of Punjab and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Hemant Gupta and; Rajesh Bindal, JJ.
Aug-13-2008
Sales Tax/VAT
(2008)17VST108(P& H)
Rajesh Bindal, J.1. This order will dispose of the bunch of 37 writ petitions bearing Nos. 46, 53, 54, 55, 59, 67, 68, 69, 70, 85, 88, 124, 125, 126, 127,128,135,139,140,142,146,153,155,159,160,161,165,184, 215, 219, 220, 555, 602,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dalip Singh Vs. Suman Devi and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Rajesh Bindal, J.
May-29-2009
Family
(2009)155PLR615
Rajesh Bindal, J.1. This is an unfortunate case where the custody of a minor child is in dispute amongst his parental and maternal grand-fathers. Another disturbing factor in the case is that mother, maternal grand mother...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax-i Vs. Abhishek Industries Ltd.
Punjab and Haryana
Adarsh Kumar Goel and; Rajesh Bindal, JJ.
Aug-04-2006
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28, 36, 36(1), 41(1), 72, 143(3) and 256(1); Evidence Act - Sections 106; Punjab General Sales Tax (Deferment and Exemption) Rules, 1991 - Rule 4A
(2006)205CTR(P& H)304; [2006]286ITR1(P& H)
Rajesh Bindal, J.1. The Revenue has filed the present appeal against order dated 27.2.2004, passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench `A' (for short, `the Tribunal') in I.T.A. No. 1017/CHANDI/97 for the assessment year 1993-94,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarbans Singh Gill Vs. State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Rajesh Bindal, J.
Feb-29-2008
Criminal
(2008)151PLR420
Rajesh Bindal, J.1. The prayer made in this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'the Code') is for quashing of order dated October 20, 2007 passed by learned Additional...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Nahar Spinning Mills Ltd.
Punjab and Haryana
M.M. Kumar and; Rajesh Bindal, JJ.
May-02-2007
Direct Taxation
(2007)212CTR(P& H)514; [2008]296ITR470(P& H)
Rajesh Bindal, J.1. The Revenue has approached this Court by filing the present appeal against order clt. 29th Nov., 2005 passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench 'A' Chandigarh (for short 'the Tribunal'), In ITA...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Nahar Exports Ltd.
Punjab and Haryana
M.M. Kumar and; Rajesh Bindal, JJ.
May-02-2007
Direct Taxation
(2007)213CTR(P& H)20; [2008]296ITR419(P& H)
Rajesh Bindal, J.1. The Revenue has approached this Court by filing the present appeal, raising the following substantial questions of law, arising out of order dt. 18th Dec, 2003 passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhupindra Gram Udyog Samiti (Regd.) and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and a ...
Punjab and Haryana
Rajesh Bindal, J.
Oct-29-2007
Civil
(2008)150PLR693
Rajesh Bindal, J. 1. This order will dispose of bunch of cases bearing Civil Writ Petition Nos. 11390 to 11395 of 2000 as common questions of law and facts are involved. The facts are extracted from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMander Singh and ors. Vs. Ladi
Punjab and Haryana
Rajesh Bindal, J.
Mar-26-2008
Criminal
(2008)151PLR510
Rajesh Bindal, J.1. The challenge in the present petition is to the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bathinda in revision filed by the respondent against the order passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »