Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Shri Ashok Kumar Bharti and Shri Vijay ...
Allahabad
R.K. Agrawal and ;Rajes Kumar, JJ.
Jul-08-2005
Direct Taxation
Income-Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 21, 147, 148 and 256(1); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 34
[2006]282ITR496(All)
Rajes Kumar, J.1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following question under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act (hereinafter referred to as 'Act') relating to the assessment year 1986-87 for opinion to this Court:'Whether...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Ashok Kumar Bharti and Vijay Kumar Goel
Allahabad
R.K. Agrawal and ;Rajes Kumar, JJ.
Jul-08-2005
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 21, 147, 148 and 256(1); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 34
(2005)198CTR(All)260
Rajes Kumar, J.1. The Tribunal has referred the following question under Section 256(1) of the IT Act (hereinafter referred to as 'Act') relating to the asst. yr. 1986-87 for opinion to this Court :'Whether, on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEjaz Ahmad and ors. Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and ors.
Allahabad
Rajes Kumar, J.
Sep-12-2003
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1998 - Sections 147
II(2004)ACC236; 2005ACJ1421; 2003(4)AWC3412
Rajes Kumar, J. 1. Present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, is directed against the order dated 30.3.1995, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kanpur Dehat, by which the claimant's appeal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Prashant Shukla Son of Late Ram Autar Shukla Vs. the State of U.P. Thr ...
Allahabad
Rajes Kumar, J.
Jul-10-2006
Service
Societies Registration Act, 1860; Constitution of India - Article 226
2006(4)AWC4213
Rajes Kumar, J.1. By means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 13.09.2004 passed by the respondent No. 2 and the resolution...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTechnical Glass Industries Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax
Allahabad
R.K. Agrawal and ;Rajes Kumar, JJ.
Sep-09-2005
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act - Sections 69, 69A, 131, 132(1), 132(5) and 260A
(2006)202CTR(All)33; [2006]281ITR61(All)
Rajes Kumar, J.1. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as 'Act') is directed against the order of Tribunal dated 07.11.2002 for the assessment year 1991-92.2. The aforesaid appeal has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSudhir Kumar Srivastava Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through General Manag ...
Allahabad
Rajes Kumar and ;S.S. Chauhan, JJ.
May-22-2008
Civil
2008(4)AWC3429
Rajes Kumar and S.S. Chauhan, JJ.1. This first appeal from order is directed against the judgment and award dated 24.9.1999, whereby the claim petition of the appellant has been dismissed.2. The facts, in brief, are that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan Lever Limited Formerly Known as Brook Bond Lipton India Limi ...
Allahabad
Rajes Kumar, J.
Jul-06-2007
Labour and Industrial
[2007(115)FLR76]; (2008)ILLJ222All
Rajes Kumar, J.1. By means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the award dated 27th March, 1997 passed by the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Agra...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnil Rice Mill Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax
Allahabad
R.K. Agrawal and ;Rajes Kumar, JJ.
Jul-11-2005
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 68, 69, 131, 143(1) and 256(1); Finance (No. 2) Act, 1965 - Sections 24, 24(2) and 24(3); Benami transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988
(2005)199CTR(All)69; [2006]282ITR236(All)
Rajes Kumar, J.1. Tribunal has referred the following question under Section 256(1) of the for the assessment year 1986-87 for the opinion of this Court:'Whether the Tribunal was justified in adding the cash credit in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMatsyajiwi Sahkari Samiti Ltd. through It's Secretary, Udai Raj S/o Ta ...
Allahabad
Rajes Kumar, J.
Oct-22-2008
Property
2009(1)AWC269
Rajes Kumar, J.1. Heard Sri Sheo Ram Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned Counsel appears on behalf of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Mateem Vs. Mehandi Hasan and anr.
Allahabad
Rajes Kumar, J.
May-02-2006
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 7 - Order 6, Rules 5, 15, 17 and 18; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 7 and 16; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment), 2002 - Sections 16(2); Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166, 168 and 169
2006(3)AWC3101
Rajes Kumar, J.1. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has challenged the order dated 18.12.2003, passed by District Judge. Varanasi in Civil Revision No. Nil of 2003, Mehandi Hasan v. Abdul Yatin, filed against the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »