Advanced Search Results
Samir Pharmaceuticals (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
U Shah, R Mehta
Aug-26-1986
Direct Taxation
(1986)19ITD696(Ahd.)
1. In this appeal, the assessee challenges the order of the Commissioner passed under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') in which as many as 8 grounds of appeal have been urged, but...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPearl and Co. Vs. the State of Bombay
Sales Tax Tribunal STT Mumbai
Y Dixit, R Mehta, A Ramlingam
Mar-09-1960
Sales Tax
196011STC48Tribunal
1. This application is preferred against an order made by the Additional Collector of Sales Tax, Bombay City Division (Revision) II, Bombay, on the 27th April, 1959. The facts of the case are these: The applicants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.K. Shah and Co. Vs. the State of Bombay
Sales Tax Tribunal STT Mumbai
Y Dixit, R Mehta, A Ramlingam
Jan-29-1960
Sales Tax
196011STC29Tribunal
1. This appeal arises from an order passed by the Additional Collector of Sales Tax, Northern Division, Ahmedabad, upon an application made by the appellants under Section 27(d) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 (amended)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Cloth Trading Co. Vs. the State of Bombay
Sales Tax Tribunal STT Mumbai
K Sen, R Mehta, S Parikh
Dec-22-1959
Other Taxes
196011STC28Tribunal
1. In this case the only point taken by Mr. N.C. Mehta for the applicants is that the authorities below have erred in passing an order of assessment and also an order regarding penalty in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askincome-tax Officer Vs. Manubhai K. Mehta
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
K Dixit, R Mehta
May-31-1989
Direct Taxation
(1990)32ITD117(Ahd.)
1. The first ground of appeal is that the A.A.C. erred in holding that the amount of Rs. 39,554 representing accumulation of superannuation fund received from the employer was exempt under Section 10(13) (ii).2. The assessee...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTedco Investment and Financial Vs. Deputy Commissioner of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
R Mehta, Vice, D Singh
Mar-21-2003
Direct Taxation
1. Diva Singh, JM - This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order dated 1-2-2002 of CIT(A)-XIX, New Delhi pertaining to 1998-99 assessment year.2. The grounds raised by the assessee were argumentative in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAddy Pharmacy Vs. the State of Bombay
Sales Tax Tribunal STT Mumbai
K Sen, M Vakil, R Mehta
Jan-13-1956
Land Acquisition
19567STC340Tribunal
1. These revision applications are concerned with three periods of assessment, viz. 1st July, 1947, to 2nd March, 1948 ; 3rd March, 1948, to 13th April, 1949, and 14th April, 1949, to 6th November, 1949.During the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOriental Building and Furnishing Vs. Deputy Commissioner of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
R Mehta, B Saluja
Feb-22-1995
Direct Taxation
(1995)53ITD198(Delhi)
1. The assessee is in appeal against separate orders of CIT(A)-XII, New Delhi dated 9-9-1992, 19-7-1993 and 20-7-1993 for the assessment years 1989-90 and 1990-91. As the three appeals involve common issues, the same are being...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskErach S. Mehta Vs. Second Assistant Controller of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
U Shah, R Mehta
Feb-23-1987
Direct Taxation
(1987)22ITD266(Ahd.)
1. The accountable person by means of this appeal has challenged the action of the OED (A) by means of the following two specific grounds : (1) The learned CED (A)-IV, Ahmedabad erred in holding that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKara Bhima Vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority
Mumbai
Meena Y.R.,; Mehta D.A. and; Dave A.S., JJ.
Aug-14-2007
Civil
Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 - Sections 9, 39, 53 and 56 - Schedule-I - Article 36; Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961
2008(3)BomCR910; AIR2007Guj198(FB); 2008AIHC33(Guj)(FB)
Mehta D.A., J.1. The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Gujarat State has referred the following two questions under Section 56 of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 (the Act):S(1) Whether the said instrument Titled as Deed of Simple...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »