Advanced Search Results
Ponnusami Alias Periana Kone and ors. Vs. Palayathan and anr.
Chennai
Phillips, J.
Mar-07-1919
Contract
51Ind.Cas.252
Phillips, J.1. This case is by no means identical with Ram Sarup Bhagat v. Bansi Mandar 60 Ind. Cas. 955 ; 42 C.P 742 ; 19 C.W.N. 1118 in which the debtor bound himself to serve...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.A. Ayyathurai Ayyar Vs. C.S. Sivarama Pattar Karikar
Chennai
Phillips, J.
Nov-15-1915
Civil
32Ind.Cas.233
Phillips, J.1. The appellant's Vakil contends that as appellant endorsed a promissory note for Rs. 300 in favour of respondent, the contract that is implied by the endorsement includes an acknowledgment of the full consideration, and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThirumalai Pillai and ors. Vs. Arunachella Padayachi and ors.
Chennai
Phillips, J.
Apr-15-1925
Civil
AIR1926Mad540; 92Ind.Cas.520
Phillips, J.1. This is an appeal by the trustees of the Pachayappa's Charities to recover rent from the respondents. The appeal was filed by all the nine trustees, but, since the appeal was filed, two of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Gopisetti Narayanaswami Naidu Garu, Receiver of Nidadavole and Medur E ...
Chennai
Phillips, J.
Nov-11-1915
Limitation
AIR1916Mad1155(2); 32Ind.Cas.816
Phillips, J.1. It has been held by this Court in Narayanaswami Naidu v. Gantayya (1915) M.W.N. 865 and Ramanadan Chetti v. Periatambi Shervai 6 M.K 250 that an execution petition returned for amendment but not re-presented,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMurugappa Chettiar Vs. Palaniyappa Chetty
Chennai
Phillips, J.
Jul-17-1917
Land Acquisition
(1917)42MLJ507
Phillips, J.1. Under Order XXI, Rule 89, the money paid into Court is (a) & sum for payment to the purchaser and (b) a sum for payment to the decree holder. It is contended for petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe M. and S.M. Ry. Co. Ltd. Vs. K. Rangaswamy Chetty and anr.
Chennai
Phillips, J.
Mar-16-1923
Right to Information
73Ind.Cas.537
Phillips, J.1. So far as the goods bought from Kaveri Chetty are concerned, it is obvious that plaintiffs can claim no damages and this is practically conceded in argument. Under Section 91 of the Indian Contract...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.V. Vytheswara Iyer Vs. K.M.R.M.L. Kumarappa Chettiar
Chennai
William Watkin Phillips, J.
Nov-29-1928
Land Acquisition
115Ind.Cas.247
William Watkin Phillips, J.1. In this case the petitioner is the testamentary guardian of defendants Nos. 2 and 3 in the suit in the District Munsif's Court. Notice was taken to the petitioner to Calcutta although...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSinnanna Goundan Vs. Veerappa Goundan and ors.
Chennai
Phillips, J.
Jan-19-1925
Land Acquisition
90Ind.Cas.900
Phillips, J.1. This appeal relates to a question of easement. The plaintiff's father and the first defendant effected a partition about 25 years ago and now the plaintiff claims to have a right to drain off...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChinnathambi Chetti and ors. Vs. Appavoo Chetty Alias Ardhanari Chetty ...
Chennai
Phillips, J.
Apr-15-1925
Civil
90Ind.Cas.1031
Phillips, J.1. The facts of this case are as follows: One Ponnappa Chetty and his brother Periyanna Chetty executed a promissory note. After Periyanna Chetty's death, a decree was obtained against Ponnappa Chetty and Periyanna Chetty's...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.S. Suppuswami Iyer Vs. the Corporation of Madras
Chennai
Phillips, J.
Mar-10-1925
Land Acquisition
91Ind.Cas.7
Phillips, J.1. The main point argued in this appeal is that the regulations passed by the Standing Committee of the Madras Corporation in respect of the rates levied for the supply of water are ultra vires....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »