Advanced Search Results
National Union of Comm. Employees and ors. Vs. B.D. Borude and ors.
Mumbai
Pendse, J.
Jan-23-1986
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 15
(1995)IIILLJ633Bom
Pendse, J:1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the employees are challenging the legality of the award dated October 11, 1983 passed by Shri B.D. Borude, Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishnacharan Pramodnath Chakraberti Vs. Indian Textiles Co. Ltd. and ...
Mumbai
Pendse, J.
Feb-11-1986
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 33C(2)
[1986(52)FLR289]; (1995)IIILLJ630Bom
Pendse, J.1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the legality of the order dated March 14, 1985 passed by the Presiding Officer, First Labour Court, Bombay,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDinkar Shankar Pawar Vs. the Elphinstone Spg. and Wvg. Mills Co. and a ...
Mumbai
Pendse, J.
Jul-21-1986
Labour and Industrial
Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 4; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 33(C)
(1995)IIILLJ641Bom
Pendse, J. 1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the legality of order dated March 31, 1982 passed by the Industrial Court, Bombay and appellate authority...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Digvijay Cement Company Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Pendse, J.
Feb-12-1986
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1) and 10(3)
[1986(52)FLR362]; (1995)IIILLJ491Bom
Pendse, J. 1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Company is challenging the legality of two orders passed by the State Government in exercise of powers under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV. Venkatesh Vs. Union of India and Others
Mumbai
M.L. Pendse, J.
Apr-28-1981
Labour and Industrial
Employees Provident Funds and Family Pension Fund Act, 1952 - Sections 1(3), 1(5), 2(A), 7A and 16
[1981(43)FLR65]; (1982)ILLJ162Bom
1. The short question is which arises for determination in this petition is whether is whether the petitioner working in the Head Office of respondent No. 3 is entitled to claim advantages of the provisions of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnmedali Brothers Vs. Hami and Co. and anr.
Mumbai
Pendse, J.
Aug-09-1984
Intellectual Property Rights
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 9, 11, 32 and 56
AIR1985Bom306
ORDER1. This petition has been filed for rectification of registered trade mark No. 221462 registered in the year 1964 in favour of respondent 1 and the proceedings are instituted under S. 56(1) of the Trade Merchandise...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuresh Tulsidas Kailachand and ors. Vs. Collector of Bombay and ors.
Mumbai
M.L. Pendse, J.
Jul-24-1979
Labour and Industrial
Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(17); Indian Companies Act, 1913; Bombay Relief Undertaking (Special Provisions) Act, 1958 - Sections 3 and 4(1)
(1980)IILLJ81Bom
1. This petition raises an interesting question as to whether the Directors of a Public Limited Company are principal employers within the meaning of S. 2(17) of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMumbai Mazdoor Sabha Vs. Bennet Coleman and Co. Limited and ors.
Mumbai
M.L. Pendse, J.
Aug-13-1979
Labour and Industrial
Indian Trade Unions Act - Sections 3(18) and 28; Companies Act; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Preventions of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 24(1); Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2(1); Constitution of India - Article 226
(1980)ILLJ112Bom
1. By this petition filed under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are challenging the correctness of the order dated July 20, 1979 passed by the Industrial Court, Bombay, refusing to grant interim...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVictoria Jubilee Technical Institute Vs. K.S. Naik, Regional P.F. Comm ...
Mumbai
M.L. Pendse, J.
Jul-18-1979
Labour and Industrial
Employees' Provident Fund and Family Pensions Fund Act, 1952 - Sections 17; Constitution of India - Article 226
(1980)ILLJ254Bom
1. The short question which falls for consideration is whether the provisions of the Employees' Provident Fund and Family Pensions Fund Act, 1952 applies to Victoria Jubilee Technical Institute. Only few facts are required to be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Krishna Nagvenkar and Others Vs. Hari Vishnoo Lotlekar
Mumbai
M.L. Pendse, J.
Nov-17-1988
Company
Portuguese Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Articles 1 and 123
[1989]66CompCas321(Bom)
Pendse, J.1. These two revision applications can be conveniently disposed of by a common judgment as the parties to the dispute in these two applications are the same and the dispute also is interrelated. The facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »