Advanced Search Results
Kanahi Ram Vs. Biddya Ram
Allahabad
Robert Stuart, C.J. and ;Pearson, J.
Dec-31-1969
Family
(1875)ILR1All549
Pearson, J.1. This case has been argued before us at great length, and the conclusion at which I have arrived, after consideration of all that has been said on both sides, is that the suit as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhop Singh and ors. Vs. Debi Singh
Allahabad
Robert Stuart, C.J. and ;Pearson, J.
Dec-31-1969
Civil
(1875)ILR1All709
Pearson, J.1. After disposing of the other pleas in appeal, continued:--The pleader's fee clearly should not be reckoned upon a valuation of the properties which is found to be false. Whether it should he calculated on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUda Begam Vs. Imam-ud-din
Allahabad
Robert Stuart, C.J. and ;Pearson, J.
Dec-31-1969
Civil
(1880)ILR2All74
Pearson, J.1. The admissibility of this appeal has been virtually determined by a recent Full Bench judgment I.L.R 1 All. 668 which, until overruled, is binding on us. In my opinion the appeal is admissible the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
imam Baksh and ors. Vs. Ilahi Baksh and ors.
Allahabad
Robert Stuart, C.J. and ;Pearson, J.
Dec-31-1969
Civil
(1875)ILR1All324
1. As to the first plea, it would seem that the reason for which the former suit was withdrawn was that a fresh suit might he brought which should include a portion which had been omitted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmperor Vs. Gopi Mohan Saha
Kolkata
Pearson, J.
Feb-12-1924
Criminal
AIR1925Cal479,(1924)ILR51Cal827,84Ind.Cas.340
Pearson, J.1. The only question is whether the prosecution or the defence has to begin. There have been various English cases cited, some of which incline to one view and some to the other. It appears...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: NaraIn Das
Allahabad
Pearson, J.
Dec-31-1969
Criminal
(1875)ILR1All610
Pearson, J.1. The opinion of the Assessors does not appear to have been taken as it is not found on the record. The omission to take it was a serious irregularity and must be pointed out...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagan Nath Singh Vs. Surjan Singh
Allahabad
Robert Stuart, C.J. and ;Pearson, J.
Dec-31-1969
Property
(1880)ILR2All315
Pearson, J.1. The first and last of the pleas in appeal are not pressed and are indeed admitted not to be tenable. The second plea is over-ruled in reference to the Privy Council's ruling in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Queen Vs. Peterson
Allahabad
Pearson, J.
Dec-31-1969
Criminal
(1875)ILR1All316
Pearson, J.1. I proceed to consider whether the prisoner has been rightly convicted of an attempt to commit the offence defined in Section 494, Indian Penal Code. He was charged with and has been found guilty...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMofizuddIn Mondal and anr. Vs. Sekandar Molla
Kolkata
Pearson, J.
Apr-10-1933
Criminal
AIR1934Cal133,147Ind.Cas.1095
ORDERPearson, J.1. A complaint is made by the petitioners in this case that after the conclusion of the arguments the Magistrate allowed P.W. No. 2 who had already been examined--a man named Maula Bux--to give further...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Gopal Dass Auroba
Kolkata
Pearson, J.
Jun-23-1925
Property
91Ind.Cas.975
Pearson, J.1. This is an appeal against an order made by the Registrar in insolvency, dated the 5th June 1925, by which he refused to pass a protection order in favour of the insolvent. He has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »