Advanced Search Results
In Re: Edward Philbert
Chennai
Pandrang Row, J.
Oct-24-1934
Criminal
159Ind.Cas.663
ORDERPandrang Row, J.1. Two points raised in tins petition, viz., that the Chief Presidency Magistrate was wrong in refusing to allow the accused to have the prosecution witnesses re-summoned and re-cross-examined after the framing of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Kaliyappaudayan
Chennai
Pandrang Row, J.
Feb-04-1937
Right to Information
168Ind.Cas.867
ORDERPandrang Row, J.1. The petitioner and several others were accused of being in possession of billets of illicit sandalwood suspected to have been removed from a certain reserve forest and they were charged with an offence...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGanesh Naidu and ors. Vs. C. Mallaram Singh
Chennai
Pandrang Row, J.
Apr-17-1936
Land Acquisition
AIR1937Mad648; 172Ind.Cas.254
Pandrang Row, J.1. This is an appeal from the decree of the City Civil Judge, Madras, dated February 2, 1935, in O.S. No. 783 of 1934, a suit for ejecting the defendants and for recovery of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Yelamanchili Anantaramayya Vs. Suryadevara Narasayya
Chennai
Pandrang Row, J.
Aug-13-1934
MRTP
153Ind.Cas.266
Pandrang Row, J.1. The petitioner's suit which was based, on a promissory-note said to have been executed by the defendant on September 1, 1927, was filed on August 26, 1930, and dismissed on August 13, 1931,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTummalappali Veeramma and anr. Vs. Akkivarapu Vebrappa and ors.
Chennai
Pandrang Row, J.
Oct-01-1936
Land Acquisition
173Ind.Cas.333
Pandrang Row, J.1. This second appeal arises out of a suit instituted by the two plaintiffs for recovery of possession of the plaint properties with mesne profits. The plaintiffs claimed to recover possession on the strength...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVeerana Goundan and ors. Vs. Sellappa Goundan and ors.
Chennai
Pandrang Row, J.
Oct-30-1935
Property
AIR1936Mad262; 162Ind.Cas.325
Pandrang Row, J.1. This second appeal arises out of a suit for a declaration that the alienation of the plaint properties in 1894 by the former manager of the temple of which the plaintiff is the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Periaswami thevan and anr.
Chennai
Pandrang Row, J.
Sep-18-1934
Criminal
152Ind.Cas.696
Pandrang Row, J.1. The two appellants in this appeal have been convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge of Coimbatore, the 1st appellant of an offence punishable under Section 201, Indian Penal Code, and the 2nd appellant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSenthattikalai Pandia Chinna Thambiar (Deceased) and anr. Vs. K. Rama ...
Chennai
Pandrang, Row, J.
Apr-07-1936
Land Acquisition
164Ind.Cas.794
Pandrang, Row, J.1. These are appeals from the orders of the District Judge of Tinnevelly, dated February 10, 1934. in three connected appeals allowing the appeals and remanding the suits to the trial Court for fresh...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: D.M. Venkatanarayana Ayyar
Chennai
Pandrang Row, J.
Jan-15-1937
Service Tax
168Ind.Cas.291
ORDERPandrang Row, J.1. The petitioner in this case is a coffee hotel-keeper at Trichinopoly, who has been convicted of an offence punishable under Section 5(I) of the Madras Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1918. The offence...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.S. Rajagopala Iyer Vs. Palaniswami Goundan
Chennai
Pandrang Row, J.
Oct-26-1934
Miscellaneous
AIR1935Mad319; 159Ind.Cas.692
ORDERPandrang Row, J.1. This application is not opposed by the learned Public Prosecutor who concedes that the petitioner must be deemed to have acted in his official capacity as a Sub-Magistrate when the acts alleged against...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »