Advanced Search Results
Sunsui India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
A T V.K., P Chacko, S Kang
May-18-2004
Service Tax
(2004)(170)ELT459TriDel
1. M/s. Sunsui (India) Ltd. (appellants in E/2106/2002/NB) were engaged, in the manufacture of wrist watches and alarm clocks of Headings 91.02/91.05 of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule and were availing the facility of MODVAT/CENVAT credit....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOta Kandla P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cus.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
S T Gowri, P Chacko, J Balasundaram
Jun-12-2002
Customs
(2003)(159)ELT446Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This appeal is against the order of the Commissioner revoking the licence issued to the appellant to function as a Custom House Agent at Kandla under the Customs House Agent Licensing Regulations, 1984 (hereinafter Regulation).3....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askintertec Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
A T V.K., P Chacko
Nov-23-2000
Service Tax
(2001)(74)ECC155
1. The common issued involved in all these four appeals filed by M/s.Intertec is whether the exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E., dated 28.2.93 is available to other goods manufactured by them in view of the fact...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Fci Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
N T C.N.B., P Chacko
Jul-18-2002
Service Tax
(2002)(84)ECC31
1. These three appeals of Food Corporation of India raise a common issue. That issue is whether Ammonium Chloride imported by them were eligible for exemption in terms of ad hoc exemption Order No. 404, dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGold Plast Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
S Peeran, R K Jeet, P Chacko
Apr-22-2003
Excise
(2003)(156)ELT524Tri(Chennai)
1. This appeal along with stay application has been filed by the appellants against the order in original Sl. No. 8/2001 (Commr.), dated 3-4-2001 by which he has demanded a duty of Rs. 1,26,10,770/- under the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. M.R.F. Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
P Chacko, R K Jeet, N T C.N.B.
Apr-13-2006
Excise
(2006)(109)ECC167
1. All these appeals are by the Revenue. Appeals E/3170 to 3177/98 are against an order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Chennai vacating certain demands of duty on intermediate products of the respondents' factory at Thiruvottiyur...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Elgi Ultra Industries
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
P Chacko, R K Jeet
Jul-12-2002
Service Tax
(2002)LC242Tri(Chennai)
1. This is Revenue's appeal challenging the grant of refund of an amount of duty of Rs. 41,58,566/- by the lower appellate authority to the respondents.2. The Respondents are manufacturers of Drip Irrigation System falling under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askitc Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
S Peeran, R K Jeet, P Chacko
Oct-25-2002
Service Tax
(2003)(85)ECC337
1. This appeal by M/s. ITC Ltd. is directed against Order-in-Original No. 16/98-CAU, dated 2-2-98 despatched on 16-3-1998, of the Commissioner of Customs, Chennai in which the Id. Commissioner has confirmed the demand of Rs. 69,78,348.87...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.C.P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
S Peeran, R K Jeet, P Chacko
Jun-03-2003
Land Acquisition
(2003)(161)ELT725Tri(Chennai)
1. This is an appeal filed by the appellant against the de novo Order-in-Original No. 8/97 dated 5-3-97 by which the Commissioner has confirmed Central Excise duty amount of Rs. 12,77,934/- on the price variation/escalation claims...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBombay Dyeing and Mfg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
K Sreedharan, N T C.N.B., P Chacko
Mar-22-2001
Land Acquisition
(2001)(96)LC432Tri(Mum.)bai
1. These appeals have come before us on a reference made by the West Regional Bench at Mumbai. After hearing lengthy arguments advanced by the learned Counsel representing the appellant and the learned Departmental Representative, we...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »