Advanced Search Results
Muhammad MohidIn Sait Vs. the Municipal Commissioners for the City of ...
Chennai
Arnold White, C.J. and ;Moore, J.
Sep-24-1901
Civil
(1902)ILR25Mad118
Abnold White, C.J.1. In this case the plaintiff sued for an injunction to restrain the defendants (the Municipal Commissioners for the City of Madras) from continuing to use a certain plot of ground as a burning...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArumuga Chettiar Vs. Ramanadan, Minor by Guardian thenukodi Athal
Chennai
Moore, J.
Mar-16-1920
Service Tax
59Ind.Cas.898
Moore, J.1. The point for determination is, whether the letter, Exhibit B., sent by the defendant's Pleader to the plaintiff's Pleader constituted a sufficient acknowledgment of liability under Section 19 of the Indian Limitation Act, to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAlagappa Chetti Vs. Sabathambal and ors.
Chennai
Moore, J.
Jan-23-1902
Civil
(1902)ILR25Mad724
Moore, J.1. The order of the District Judge cannot be upheld, The petitioner was arrested on the 22nd January 1899 but was released under Section 336, Civil Procedure Code, on his furnishing security that he would...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re: Pullannavara Hanumantha
Chennai
Moore, J.
Sep-15-1919
Criminal
53Ind.Cas.620
Moore, J.1. The petitioner and five other persons were convicted of the offence of rioting armed with deadly weapons (sections 148, Indian Penal Code). On appeal the Sessions Judge of Bellary altered the finding in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKoyyana Chittemma and anr. Vs. Doosy Gavaramma and ors.
Chennai
Arnold White, C.J. and; Moore, J.
Dec-05-1905
Civil
(1906)ILR29Mad225
1. For the purposes of the questions we have to consider in this appeal, the material facts are as follows:In July 1890 the father of the plaintiffs mortgaged certain lands to certain parties whose interest is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArunachellam Chetty Vs. Ramanadhan Chetty (Minor) by His Next Friend A ...
Chennai
Arnold White, C.J. and; Moore, J.
Dec-05-1905
Civil
(1906)ILR29Mad309
1. The appellant asked for an order under Section 258, Civil Procedure Code, certifying that the claim of the attaching-creditor had been adjusted by a compromise. The attaching-creditor is a minor and when the application under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChinnasami Mudali Vs. Tirumalai Pillai and the Right Honourable the Se ...
Chennai
Arnold White, C.J. and ;Moore, J.
Oct-10-1901
Civil
(1902)ILR25Mad572
1. Muthu Annathai Naick obtained a loan under Act XIX of 1883 to be expended in digging a well in land No. 315 held by him on patta. Land No. 105-B was also held by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAppathura Pattar Vs. Gopala Panikkar
Chennai
Arnold White, C.J. and ;Moore, J.
Dec-05-1901
CivilProperty
(1902)ILR25Mad674
1. We think the Subordinate Judge was wrong in admitting exhibit XV in evidence as proving that in 1862 a deed was in fact executed by the parties referred to, and in the terms set out,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSeetamraju Kondalrow Vs. the Collector of Godavari on Behalf of the Se ...
Chennai
Arnold White, C.J. and ;Moore, J.
Dec-04-1901
Civil
(1902)ILR25Mad632
1. The plaintiff apparently asks for a decree directing the defendants to construct a new channel for the purpose of irrigating his land. The Railway Company, in the execution of the works authorized by Section 7...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.E.N.K.R.M.A. Venkatachellam Chetty and anr. Vs. V.E.N.K.R.M.A. Raman ...
Chennai
Abdur Rahim, C.J. and ;Moore, J.
Mar-09-1920
Arbitration
59Ind.Cas.501
1. The plaintiffs and defendants are Nattukottai Chetties carrying on business in Akyab, They had a separate money-lending business of their own. It appears that they entered into a partnership with respect to a business in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »