Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Judge: mohta j · Page 1 of about 313 results (0.034 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 15 2007

Reliance Natural Resources Ltd. Vs. Reliance Industries Limited

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Anoop V. Mohta, J.

Decided on : Oct-15-2007

Subject : Company

Acts : Oil Fields (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 3; Economic Zone and other Maritime Zone Act, 1976; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 36, 39, 235 to 251, 391 to 394, 433 and 643; Evidence Act - Sections 57 to 62; Income Tax Act - Sections 2(19AA), 2(19AAA) and 2(41A); Companies (Amendment) Act, 2002; Board of Directors Act; Contract Act - Sections 17; U.K. Act - Sections 206; Constitution of India - Article 297; Petroleum and Natural Gas Rules, 1959; Companies Rules

Reported in : [2009]149CompCas129(Bom); [2008]82SCL303(Bom)

Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. A founder father, late Dhirubhai Ambani set up the Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) some time in the year 1973, who ventured along with the time, into oil, gas, refining and exploration apart...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2012

Radhika George and ors Vs. 6 Tanishq Builders.

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Anoop V. Mohta, J.

Decided on : Apr-24-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 - Section 95A; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act - Section 164

ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.1 Heard by consent of the parties in view of order of Division Bench dated 11 January 2012 thereby directed to hear and dispose of the Writ Petition with restricted prayer clauses which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2004

Global Trust Bank Ltd. Vs. Killick Nixon Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Anoop V. Mohta, J.

Decided on : May-06-2004

Subject : CompanyBanking

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434 and 439

Reported in : III(2004)BC458; [2005]128CompCas1007(Bom)

ORDERAnoop V. Mohta, J.1. The present Company Petition has been filed by the petitioner Global Trust Bank Ltd., a Banking Corporation incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'Companies Act') against Killick Nixon Ltd., (for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 06 2004

In Re: Canere Actives and Fine Chemicals (P.) Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Anoop V. Mohta, J.

Decided on : May-06-2004

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 394

Reported in : 2004(6)BomCR378; (2004)3CompLJ374(Bom); [2004]53SCL413(Bom)

ORDERAnoop V. Mohta, J.1. The present Company petition is under section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'Companies Act') read with Rules 67 to 89 of the Company (Court) Rules, 1956 (for short `Rules')...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2004

In Re: Morarjee Goculdas Spg. and Wvg. Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Anoop V. Mohta, J.

Decided on : May-06-2004

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 78, 100 to 104, 235 to 251 and 391 to 394

Reported in : 2004(6)BomCR836; (2004)3CompLJ380(Bom); [2004]55SCL680(Bom)

Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. The present company petition has been filed by the company known as the Morarjee Goculdas Spinning and Weaving Mills Company Ltd., a company deemed to be incorporated under the Companies Act and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2004

In Re: Nicholas Piramal India Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Anoop V. Mohta, J.

Decided on : May-06-2004

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 235 to 251 and 394

Reported in : 2004(6)BomCR287; (2004)3CompLJ369(Bom); [2004]54SCL66(Bom)

ORDERAnoop V. Mohta, J.1. Petitioner herein is Nicholas Piramal India Limited, a company having its registered office at 100, Centre Point, Dr. Ambedkar Road, Parel, Mumbai (for short 'NPIL' and/or 'transferee company') has filed the present...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2004

In Re: Emco Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Anoop V. Mohta, J.

Decided on : May-06-2004

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 394

Reported in : 2005(1)BomCR451; (2004)3CompLJ411(Bom); [2004]54SCL76(Bom)

ORDERAnoop V. Mohta, J.1. The present company petition has been filed by the EMCO Ltd. ('EMCO or Transferee Company') having its registered office at N-104, MIDC Area Jalgaon, under the provisions of Sections 391 to 394...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2004

In Re: Indusind Bank Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Anoop V. Mohta, J.

Decided on : May-06-2004

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391

Reported in : 2004(6)BomCR221; (2004)4CompLJ394(Bom); 2004(4)MhLj524; [2004]55SCL37(Bom)

ORDERAnoop V. Mohta, J.1. This Company Petition has been taken out by the petitioner IndusInd Bank Limited under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'Companies Act') for sanction of Scheme of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 1993

Deoram Tulshiram Patil Vs. Zilla Parishad and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Judge : V.A. Mohta, J.;V.A. Mohta, J.

Decided on : Jul-22-1993

Subject : Contract

Acts : Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act - 1961, Sections 280

Reported in : 1994(2)BomCR525

V.A. Mohta, J.1. Appellant/Original Plaintiff is a contractor. He undertook to make special repairs of 'Taharabad Bandhara' constructed by the respondents/Original defendants - the Zilla Parishad, Nasik. After the work was completed, measurements were taken and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 14 2006

Vishwanath Ramkrishna Patil and anr. Vs. Ashok Murlidhar Sonar and anr ...

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Anoop V. Mohta, J.

Decided on : Jun-14-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 200, 202, 203, 397, 397(3) and 482; Constitution of India - Article 227; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 406, 409 and 418

Reported in : 2006(5)MhLj671

ORDERAnoop V. Mohta, J.1. Heard the learned advocate for the petitioners, the learned advocate for respondent No. 1 and the learned A.P.P. for the respondent No. 2-State, at great length.2. The present writ petition under Article...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial