Advanced Search Results
Reliance Natural Resources Ltd. Vs. Reliance Industries Limited
Mumbai
Anoop V. Mohta, J.
Oct-15-2007
Company
Oil Fields (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 3; Economic Zone and other Maritime Zone Act, 1976; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 36, 39, 235 to 251, 391 to 394, 433 and 643; Evidence Act - Sections 57 to 62; Income Tax Act - Sections 2(19AA), 2(19AAA) and 2(41A); Companies (Amendment) Act, 2002; Board of Directors Act; Contract Act - Sections 17; U.K. Act - Sections 206; Constitution of India - Article 297; Petroleum and Natural Gas Rules, 1959; Companies Rules
[2009]149CompCas129(Bom); [2008]82SCL303(Bom)
Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. A founder father, late Dhirubhai Ambani set up the Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) some time in the year 1973, who ventured along with the time, into oil, gas, refining and exploration apart...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRadhika George and ors Vs. 6 Tanishq Builders.
Mumbai
Anoop V. Mohta, J.
Apr-24-2012
Land Acquisition
Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 - Section 95A; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act - Section 164
ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.1 Heard by consent of the parties in view of order of Division Bench dated 11 January 2012 thereby directed to hear and dispose of the Writ Petition with restricted prayer clauses which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGlobal Trust Bank Ltd. Vs. Killick Nixon Ltd.
Mumbai
Anoop V. Mohta, J.
May-06-2004
CompanyBanking
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434 and 439
III(2004)BC458; [2005]128CompCas1007(Bom)
ORDERAnoop V. Mohta, J.1. The present Company Petition has been filed by the petitioner Global Trust Bank Ltd., a Banking Corporation incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'Companies Act') against Killick Nixon Ltd., (for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re: Canere Actives and Fine Chemicals (P.) Ltd.
Mumbai
Anoop V. Mohta, J.
May-06-2004
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 394
2004(6)BomCR378; (2004)3CompLJ374(Bom); [2004]53SCL413(Bom)
ORDERAnoop V. Mohta, J.1. The present Company petition is under section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'Companies Act') read with Rules 67 to 89 of the Company (Court) Rules, 1956 (for short `Rules')...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Morarjee Goculdas Spg. and Wvg. Co. Ltd.
Mumbai
Anoop V. Mohta, J.
May-06-2004
Company
Companies Act - Sections 78, 100 to 104, 235 to 251 and 391 to 394
2004(6)BomCR836; (2004)3CompLJ380(Bom); [2004]55SCL680(Bom)
Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. The present company petition has been filed by the company known as the Morarjee Goculdas Spinning and Weaving Mills Company Ltd., a company deemed to be incorporated under the Companies Act and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Nicholas Piramal India Ltd.
Mumbai
Anoop V. Mohta, J.
May-06-2004
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 235 to 251 and 394
2004(6)BomCR287; (2004)3CompLJ369(Bom); [2004]54SCL66(Bom)
ORDERAnoop V. Mohta, J.1. Petitioner herein is Nicholas Piramal India Limited, a company having its registered office at 100, Centre Point, Dr. Ambedkar Road, Parel, Mumbai (for short 'NPIL' and/or 'transferee company') has filed the present...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Emco Ltd.
Mumbai
Anoop V. Mohta, J.
May-06-2004
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 394
2005(1)BomCR451; (2004)3CompLJ411(Bom); [2004]54SCL76(Bom)
ORDERAnoop V. Mohta, J.1. The present company petition has been filed by the EMCO Ltd. ('EMCO or Transferee Company') having its registered office at N-104, MIDC Area Jalgaon, under the provisions of Sections 391 to 394...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Indusind Bank Ltd.
Mumbai
Anoop V. Mohta, J.
May-06-2004
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391
2004(6)BomCR221; (2004)4CompLJ394(Bom); 2004(4)MhLj524; [2004]55SCL37(Bom)
ORDERAnoop V. Mohta, J.1. This Company Petition has been taken out by the petitioner IndusInd Bank Limited under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'Companies Act') for sanction of Scheme of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeoram Tulshiram Patil Vs. Zilla Parishad and ors.
Mumbai
V.A. Mohta, J.;V.A. Mohta, J.
Jul-22-1993
Contract
Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act - 1961, Sections 280
1994(2)BomCR525
V.A. Mohta, J.1. Appellant/Original Plaintiff is a contractor. He undertook to make special repairs of 'Taharabad Bandhara' constructed by the respondents/Original defendants - the Zilla Parishad, Nasik. After the work was completed, measurements were taken and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVishwanath Ramkrishna Patil and anr. Vs. Ashok Murlidhar Sonar and anr ...
Mumbai
Anoop V. Mohta, J.
Jun-14-2006
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 200, 202, 203, 397, 397(3) and 482; Constitution of India - Article 227; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 406, 409 and 418
2006(5)MhLj671
ORDERAnoop V. Mohta, J.1. Heard the learned advocate for the petitioners, the learned advocate for respondent No. 1 and the learned A.P.P. for the respondent No. 2-State, at great length.2. The present writ petition under Article...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »