Advanced Search Results
Palaniandy Pillai Vs. Arunachellum Pillai
Chennai
Miller, J.
Nov-09-1908
Criminal
3Ind.Cas.387
ORDERMiller, J. 1. In this case the Village Magistrate is alleged to have fabricated a record of a Criminal case according to the complainant there was no such case and the whole record is evolved from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Machi Reddi Chinnappa Reddi
Chennai
Miller, J.
Oct-07-1909
Criminal
4Ind.Cas.37
ORDERMiller, J.1. The pleader when he presented the appeal informed the Magistrate that he was not prepared to argue it but some other pleader would do so and the Magistrate does not question the pleader's good...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. Vencatasawmy Chetty Vs. Suppa Pillay
Chennai
Miller, J.
Oct-27-1909
Civil
4Ind.Cas.303
Miller, J.1. The lease is a lease for a term of three years and is, therefore, compulsorily registerable under Section 17 of the Indian Registration Act (or unless it is saved by the proviso to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Palaniappa Asary and ors. Vs. Emperor
Chennai
Miller, J.
Mar-10-1910
Criminal
(1911)ILR34Mad139
ORDERMiller, J.1. The Subdivisional Magistrate proceeding under Section 117 as nearly as practicable in the same way as under Section 242, Criminal Procedure Code, had to state to the accused, so to style them, the particulars...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChaturvedula Suryanarayana Vs. Chaturvedula Ramamma
Chennai
Miller, J.
Feb-21-1910
Civil
(1911)ILR34Mad88
Miller, J.1. No one appeared for respondent. I think the hearing of the application was barred by Section 17 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act as the security was not deposited until after the petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBandalapalli Pedda Bangappah and ors. Vs. Moka Subbarayadu
Chennai
Miller, J.
Aug-05-1908
Criminal
4Ind.Cas.1128a
ORDERMiller, J.1. I think I ought not to interfere with the orders passed by the District Magistrate and the second class Magistrate in this case. 2. The Magistrates had, in my opinion, jurisdiction to make the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBollapragada Garu Narayana Rao, Minor by His Mother Rama Lakshmanna Vs ...
Chennai
Miller, J.
May-07-1908
Civil
4Ind.Cas.1130
Miller, J.1.The District Munsif had, in my opinion, jurisdiction to revise his order, and though the second order which he made purports to be under Chap. VII of the Civil Procedure Code, I ought not to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManikkavasaka Desika Gnana Sambanda Pandara Sannadhiar and ors. Vs. Su ...
Chennai
Miller, J.
Feb-11-1909
Civil
4Ind.Cas.1141
Miller, J.1. I am not prepared to hold that the Subordinate Judge was wrong in admitting the review. His order has not been printed and put before me, but apparently he was of opinion that he...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskW.A. Beardsell and Co. (by their Agent, W.H.H. Johnstore) Vs. Nilgiri ...
Chennai
Miller, J.
Apr-04-1912
Criminal
(1914)ILR37Mad107
Miller, J.1. I think the Magistrate was right in holding that the sanction of the Insolvency Commissioner is necessary. Taking it that all the offences charged were complete when the claim was made before the Official...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPunni Basava and ors. Vs. Amara Gounden
Chennai
Miller, J.
Nov-04-1908
Criminal
2Ind.Cas.613
ORDERMiller, J.1. Assuming that the 1st Class Magistrate had power to alter the conviction from one under Section 341, I. P. C., to one under Section 143, I. P. C. I do not think that there...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »