Advanced Search Results
The State of Maharashtra Vs. Glaxo Laboratories (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Mumbai
B.N. Deshmukh, C.J. and ;Madon, J.
Feb-22-1979
Civil
(1980)82BOMLR46
Madon, J.1. Glaxo Laboratories (India) Pvt. Ltd., who are the respondents No. 1 before us, filed a suit on the .Original Side of this High Court against the State of Maharashtra, the Collector of Bombay, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAdvani Oerlikon Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.
Mumbai
Madon, J.
Sep-21-1976
Direct Taxation
Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256(2)
(1977)79BOMLR229; [1977]107ITR520(Bom)
Madon, J.1. This is an application in revision under section 5(2) of the Bombay Court Fees, 1959. 2. The petitioners are a private limited company and carry on the business of manufacture and sale electrodes and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhaskar Narayanrao Band Vs. Dr. Vishnu Bhikaji Kolte
Mumbai
Madon, J.
Dec-05-1969
Constitution
(1971)73BOMLR361
Madon, J.1. This is an appeal against the order of the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Chanda, vacating an ex parte ad interim injunction which was earlier granted by him, on an application made by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. Glaxo Laboratories (India) Pvt. Ltd ...
Mumbai
Deshmukh, C.J. ;and Madon, J.
Feb-22-1979
Excise
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9, 10, 19, 19(1) and 80; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 17, 18, 20, 20(1)(2), 35 and 40; ;Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955; ;Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 179 and 188; ;Central Excise Rules, 1956 - Rule 13; ;Drug Rules, 1945 - Rule 96; Rajasthan Town Municipalities Act, 1951 - Sections 179
1990LC48(Bombay); 1979(4)ELT286(Bom)
Madon, J. 1. The Glaxo Laboratories (India) Pvt. Ltd., who are the first respondents before us, filed a suit on the Original side of this High Court against the State of Maharashtra, the Collector of Bombay,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNagIn Mansukhlal Dagli Vs. Haribhai Manibhai Patel
Mumbai
Deshmukh, C.J. and;Madon, J.
Feb-08-1979
CivilTenancy
Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 19, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 and 46; Presidency Small Cause Courts (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1975; Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Bombay High Court Letters Patents Amendment Act, 1948; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 20, Rule 12; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 28; Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act; Bombay Housing Board Act, 1948; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 108; Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Sections 37; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 25; Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 37; Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 - Sections 40; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34
AIR1980Bom123
Madon, J.1. The question with respect to this Court's jurisdiction to entertain and try this suit filed on the Original Side has been referred to a Division Bench by a learned single Judge of this High...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRanchhoddas Govinddas Banatwala
Mumbai
Madon, J.
Aug-25-1975
Family
(1976)78BOMLR219; 1976MhLJ636
Madon, J.1. The interesting question which arises in this petition is whether movable property other than a liquidated sum of money is a debt as contemplated by Part X of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, so...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhagwandas Ichharam Panchal Vs. Royal Western India Turf Club Limited
Mumbai
Madon, J.
Aug-11-1969
Civil
(1970)72BOMLR764
Madon, J.1. This is an originating summons taken out by the plaintiff, Bhagwandas Ichharara Panchal, under Rule 254 of the Original Side Rules of this Court, for the deter determination of the following questions, namely, (1)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBoman Chothia Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Madon, J.
Aug-28-1970
Criminal
(1970)72BOMLR923
Madon, J.1. According to the description of himself which the petitioner, Boman Chothia, gave me at the first hearing of this revision application when he appeared in person, the petitioner is an expert on the Motor...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, Etc. Vs. Durgadas Shankar ...
Mumbai
Deshmukh, C.J. and;Madon, J.
Apr-27-1979
PropertyConstitution
Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 3, 90, 91, 92, 216, 289, 289(1), 291, 296, 296(1), 297, 297(1), 297(2), 297(3), 298, 298(1), 298(2), 298(3), 299, 299(1), 300, 301, 301(1), 301(2), 345, 346, 351, 354, 387(1), 389, 411, 502, 504 and 515; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31, 31(2), 31(5), 133(1), 226 and 366; Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 3(35) and 4; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4, 5A, 5A(2), 23, 23(1), 23(2), 24, 34 and 55; Bombay Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1905 - Sections 297 and 297(1); Bombay Municipal Act, 1872 - Sections 163; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1955; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 215 and 216; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 299; Land Acquisition (Madras Amen
AIR1980Bom93; (1980)82BOMLR76
Madon, J.1. In a Writ Petition filed on the Original Side of this High Court by one Durgadas Shankarrao Rege, the First Respondent in both these appeals, against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovernment Pleader Vs. the Groundnut Extraction Export Development Ass ...
Mumbai
Madon, J.
Sep-24-1976
Civil
(1977)79BOMLR226
Madon, J.1. The petitioner has filed this application in revision purporting to do so under Section 5(2) of the Bombay Court-fees Act, 1959.2. The facts which have given rise to this application are that on December...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »