Advanced Search Results
In Re: Banks and Fenwick
Kolkata
Barnes Peacock, C.J. and ;Macpherson, J.
May-05-1869
Land Acquisition
45Ind.Cas.113
Barnes Peacock, C.J.1. An advertisement publislied in a newspaper for a demonstration against a Judge for acts done in Court may be a contempt of Court as well as defamation, although it cannot be said that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Bittan (an Infant)
Kolkata
Macpherson, J.
May-02-1877
Civil
(1877)ILR2Cal357
Macpherson, J.1. There being no suit, has the Court power to make such and order? It is submitted it has. The power which the Court has under the Charter of 1865, Section 16, is the power...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Bungseedhur Khettry, an Insolvent Claim of Ramlall Budree Doss
Kolkata
Macpherson, J.
May-02-1877
Civil
(1877)ILR2Cal359
Macpherson, J.1. On these affidavits I find the facts to be, that, about 10 P.M., on the 20th of December, the firm of Ramlall Budree Doss, merchants in the Burra Bazar, promised at once to give...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kartick Churn Setty Vs. Gopalkisto Paulit and anr.
Kolkata
Macpherson, J.
Aug-06-1877
Civil
(1878)ILR3Cal265
Macpherson, J.1. In this case the facts, which I find to be proved, are, that the defendant Gopalkisto Paulit came to the plaintiff's place of business in Calcutta, and there got from him the jewellery, which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNeckram Dobay Vs. the Bank of Bengal
Kolkata
Macpherson, J.
Jun-22-1887
Civil
(1887)ILR14Cal703
Macpherson, J.1. I think the plaintiff is not bound to answer this interrogatory.2. The plaint alleges that the defendant improperly and without notice, and in violation of an agreement, sold some Government promissory notes which had...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Corporation of Calcutta Vs. Bheecunram Napit Alias Bheecun Napit
Kolkata
Macpherson, J.
Apr-23-1877
Criminal
(1877)ILR2Cal291
Macpherson, J.1. I am of opinion that Section 147 gives mo no power to grant this application. The object in fact is to appeal against an acquittal. But Section 147 does not provide for such an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRoychurn Dutt Vs. Ameena Bibi
Kolkata
Macpherson, J.
May-23-1877
CivilProperty
(1877)ILR2Cal386
Macpherson, J.1. The Court was of opinion that the Sheriff' was entitled to poundage upon the sum actually compromised for, and granted the application subject to such payment of poundage to the Sheriff. The Sheriff' to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHurro Doyal Roy Chowdhry Vs. Mahomed Gazi Chowdhry and ors.
Kolkata
Pigot and ;Macpherson, J.
May-27-1891
Property
(1892)ILR19Cal699
Pigot and Macpherson, J.1. In this case the appellant brings a suit to set aside the sale of a putni under Regulation VIII of 1819, on the ground that the sale was invalid, and his case...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNobIn Chunder Dey Vs. the Secretary of State for India
Kolkata
Richard Garth, C.J. and ;Macpherson, J.
Jul-13-1875
Civil
(1876)ILR1Cal12
Richard Garth, C.J.1. This was a suit brought by the plaintiff, who, for some years previously to March 1874, appears to have been a retail dealer in sidhi and other excisable articles at Calcutta, against the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskQueen-empress Vs. Debendra Krishna Mitter
Kolkata
Francis W. Maclean, K.C.I.E., C.J. and ;Macpherson, J.
Feb-23-1900
Civil
(1900)ILR27Cal587
Francis W. Maclean, K.C.I.E., C.J.1. The short point we have to decide is whether the document in this case ought to have been stamped under Article 44 of schedule I of the Stamp Act of 1879...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »