Advanced Search Results
Government of Bombay Vs. Karim Tar Mahomed
Mumbai
Macleod, J.
Jun-18-1908
Civil
(1908)10BOMLR660
Macleod, J.1. This is a reference from the Collector of Bombay, under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, to determine the amount of compensation to be awarded to Karim Tar Mahomed for certain land on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWilfred R. Padgett Vs. Jamshetji Hormusji Chothia
Mumbai
Macleod, J.
Feb-20-1916
Contract
AIR1916Bom193; (1917)ILR41Bom390
Macleod, J.1. Between the 2nd April 1913 and the 14th August 1913 the defendant signed five promissory notes for various amounts payable on demand with interest at 6 per cent in favour of Messrs. Bume and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKing King and Co. Vs. Major Francis D. Davidson
Mumbai
Macleod, J.
Feb-10-1914
Civil
AIR1914Bom137; (1914)16BOMLR233
Macleod, J.1. Messrs. King King & Co. obtained a decree against Major Davidson, then a Captain in the Indian Army, in Suit No. 303 of 1911 on the 25th of July 1911 for a sum of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Great Indian Peninsula Railway Vs. Ramchandra Jagannath
Mumbai
Basil Scott, Kt., C.J. and ;Macleod, J.
Sep-03-1918
Civil
AIR1919Bom67; (1919)21BOMLR6
Basil Scott, C.J.1. On the 16th of September 1916, the plaintiff' delivered to the defendants and the defendants accepted at the Victoria Terminus Station a parcel containing twenty-four account-books consigned to the plaintiffs firm at Nagpur...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMulji Damodar Vs. Bomanji Mancherji
Mumbai
Macleod, J.
Jun-27-1908
Civil
(1908)10BOMLR772
Macleod, J.1. By an order of the 23rd September 1882 Mancherji Bomanji, a Translator in the High Court, was appointed Committee of the above lunatic and it was also ordered that the said Mancherji Bomanji should...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSewaram Gokaldas Vs. Bajrangdat Hardwar Potdar
Mumbai
Macleod, J.
Sep-20-1915
Contract
AIR1916Bom227; (1916)ILR40Bom473
Macleod, J.1. The plaintiffs, carrying on business in Bombay, had dealings with the defendant, who is said to carry on business at Bassum in Akola under the style of Chatandas Shankardas. The plaintiffs say that the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBai Laxmi Vs. Harjivan Nathu and ors.
Mumbai
Macleod, J.
Sep-09-1911
Civil
(1912)ILR36Bom415
Macleod, J.1. The plaintiff in this suit applied for leave to continue the suit as a pauper and such leave was granted by the Prothonotary. On the application of the defendant the question has been adjourned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVishvanath P. Vaidya Vs. the London and Lancashire Life Assurance Comp ...
Mumbai
Macleod, J.
Jun-23-1910
Insurance
(1910)12BOMLR717
Macleod, J.1. The plaintiff in this case had monetary dealings with the late Dwarkadas Dharamsey. In 1904, there was a balance of about Rs. 9000 due to the plaintiff on current account. The plaintiff also accommodated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Sukhanand Gurumukhrai
Mumbai
Macleod, J.
Sep-06-1909
Property
4Ind.Cas.278
Macleod, J.1. This is a reference by the Special Acquisition Officer under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act relating to a piece of land measuring 3,009 square yards with a bungalow erected thereon situated on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDamodar Khimji Vs. Dayal Mowji
Mumbai
Macleod, J.
Aug-23-1909
Family
4Ind.Cas.283
Macleod, J.1. One Gokaldas Jetha died on 6th March 1904 leaving a Will. In that Will he sets out what property he is possessed of and particularly mentions a debt of about Rs. 2,000 due by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »