Advanced Search Results
Collector of Central Excise Vs. Krishna Carbon Paper Company
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
S Jha, Vice-, M T D.C.
Jun-08-1987
Excise
(1987)(12)LC1167Tri(Delhi)
1. Respondents have made a request for adjournment through their communication dated 27.5.1987 on the ground that their legal Advisor Shri J.S. Kapil is out of India. However, in view of what follows we are not...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDigvijay Cement Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
S Jha, Vice, R T I.J., M T D.C.
Apr-27-1988
Land Acquisition
(1988)(17)LC535Tri(Delhi)
1. In this appeal the question that arises for decision is whether the appellants manufactured and sold "rapid hardening cement" in the guise of "ordinary portland cement" during the period July 1976 to March 1977 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askindore Malwa United Mills Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
G Sankaran, S Vice-, M T D.C., G Agarwal
Mar-03-1989
Excise
(1989)(22)LC600Tri(Delhi)
1. This is an appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. 341-CE/IND/83 dated 3.12.1983 passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), New Delhi.2. The appeal was posted for hearing on 13.6.1988 and was dismissed by the Tribunal for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Collector of Customs Vs. West Coast Indl. Gases Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
M T D.C., S Maruthi, G B Deva
Jun-29-1989
Land Acquisition
(1989)(25)LC225Tri(Delhi)
1. The respondents M/s. West Coast Industrial Gases Ltd. imported 253 empty cylinders valued at Rs. 2,14,843-45 under bill of entry No. 343 dated 21st December, 1981 and claimed assessment under heading 84.66 of Customs Tariff.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDhampur Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
M T D.C., G B Deva
Jan-01-1990
Service Tax
(1990)(29)LC31Tri(Delhi)
1. By the impugned order the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) upheld the demand confirmation order passed by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Moradabad. By his order-in-original No. 140-CE/77 dated 12.7.1979, the Assistant Collector confirmed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahalaxmi Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
M T D.C., G Agarwal
Jun-25-1990
Excise
(1990)(31)LC358Tri(Delhi)
1. The appellants are manufacturers of sugar. Under Notification No.132/82-CE dated 21.4.1982, the effective rate of Central Excise duty on free-sale sugar and levy sugar was prescribed by the Government.Operative portion of that notification so far...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan Aeronautics Limited Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
S Duggal, M T D.C.
Apr-04-1986
Criminal
(1986)(7)LC373Tri(Delhi)
1. This is a Revision Application, originally filed before the Central Government, which, after transfer to this Tribunal, is being treated as an appeal.2. The appellants imported chains (Fissenwert) in August, 1978 and declared the same...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Central Excise Vs. Cawnpore Sugar Works Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
G Sankaran, S Vice-, M T D.C., G Agarwal
Jan-27-1989
Excise
(1989)(24)LC323Tri(Delhi)
1. In terms of Notification No. 108/78-CE dated 28.4.1978, issued under Rule 8 (1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, M/s. Cawnpore Sugar Works Limited (the respondents herein) were sanctioned a sum of Rs. 8,26,164.75 towards...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Shipping Corporation of India Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
M T D.C., B Prasad
May-08-1987
Right to Information
(1988)(16)LC485Tri(Kol.)kata
1. In this Miscellaneous application, the applicants have prayed for condonation of delay in riling the appeal before this Tribunal against the impugned order. Arguing for the applicants the learned advocate, Shri Mitra stated that the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskF.C.i. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
M T D.C., G Agarwal, J T P.C.
Oct-14-1988
Excise
(1989)(20)LC292Tri(Delhi)
1. We have heard Shri J. Banerjee, learned Advocate for the applicants and Shri S. Chakrabarti, learned D.R. for the respondent The Bench has pointed out to Shri Banerjee, learned Advocate, that the appeal which was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »