Advanced Search Results
Belle Vue Clinic Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
A Wadhwa, R K Jeet, M Bohra
Dec-28-2004
Land Acquisition
(2006)(197)ELT120Tri(Kol.)kata
1. Vide his impugned order, Commissioner of Customs (Airport), Kolkata, has confirmed duty of Rs. 65,06,775.00/- under Section 17(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Section 125(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, apart from confiscating...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBoc India Ltd. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
S T C., M Bohra
Apr-20-2004
Excise
(2004)(94)ECC329
1. Heard both sides. The dispute in this case relates to valuation of the impugned goods transferred by the appellants to their own unit for conversion into compressed gas. The Adjudicating Commissioner has held such transfer...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCrystal Springs Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
S T C., M Bohra
Apr-22-2004
Service Tax
(2004)(94)ECC589
1. Heard both sides. The application filed by the applicant Commissioner for condonation of delay in filing the cross objection is condoned considering the reasons given therein. The issue involved in this case relates to eligibility...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Prem Prakash Vs. Commissioner of Customs (P)
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
J T V.K., M Bohra
May-24-2004
Customs
(2004)(172)ELT398Tri(Kol.)kata
1. We have heard Shri K.K. Banerjee for the Appellant and Shri T.K.Kar, SDR for Revenue. Shri T.K. Kar, SDK has taken a preliminary objection that the ROM application has been barred by time limit under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of C. Ex. and Cus. Vs. Mehar Shoes Industries
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
J T V.K., M Bohra
Jun-09-2004
Land Acquisition
(2004)(172)ELT409Tri(Kol.)kata
1. This appeal has been filed against the Order-in-Appeal, dated 26th September, 2002 passed by the Commissioner of Appeals, Central Excise, Kolkata. By this order the Commissioner of Appeals directed the Additional Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKonark Ferrous and Cement Pvt. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. and Cus.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
J T V.K., M Bohra
Jun-17-2004
Right to Information
(2004)(174)ELT270Tri(Kol.)kata
1. This appeal has been filed against the Order-in-Original passed by Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, BBSR-II on 16th September, 2003 by which he had rejected the application made by the appellants for abatement claim...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askidcol Kalinga Iron Works Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
J T V.K., M Bohra
Aug-11-2004
MRTP
(2004)(173)ELT27Tri(Kol.)kata
1. This appeal has been filed against the order dated 15-9-03 passed by Commr. of Appeals, Central Excise & Customs, BBSR. He upheld the impugned order and rejected the appeal. Heard Shri B.J. Mookherjee, Advocate for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrakash Chharia Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Port)
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
J T V.K., M Bohra
Aug-23-2004
Service Tax
(2005)(180)ELT144Tri(Kol.)kata
1. Heard Shri A.K. Biswas, advocate for the appellant. He submits that the case of Prakash Chharia may kindly be retained at this Bench as the appellant resides at Kolkata and his business is at Kolkata....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPami Metal (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
M Bohra
Aug-25-2004
Excise
(2005)(180)ELT383Tri(Kol.)kata
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellants against the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) of Central Excise, Kolkata-II, on 31st July, 2003.2. Heard Shri S.C. Rudra, ld. Advocate along with P.K. Ghosh, ld.Consultant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCreative Products (P) Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
J T V.K., M Bohra
Aug-31-2004
MRTP
1. We have heard Shri T. Chandran, Advocate for the Appellant. We have first heard him for limitation. The advocate submits that appeal is filed within limitation. As such, condonation of delayed application is not necessary....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »