Advanced Search Results
Balaji Paper Boards (P) Ltd. and Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Author: L Ram
Oct-08-1998
Excise
(1998)(62)ECC631
1. Prior to its amendment on 27.12.1985, Section 11A of the then Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 {now called Central Excises Act, 1944, and hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'), provided that for recovery of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalanidhi and anr. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
S Bhatnagar, V A Unni, L Ram, T Members
Jan-20-1999
Land Acquisition
(1999)(82)LC417Tri(Mum.)bai
1. These are two appeals filed by M/s. Colour Prints and M/s Kalanidhi, Bombay against the common order-in-original passed by the Additional Collector, Central Excise, Bombay dt. 16.1.1989. By the impugned order excise duty of Rs....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce Vs. Indcon Structurals (P) Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
S Peeran, S T S.S., L Ram
Oct-12-2000
Service Tax
(2001)(73)ECC398
2. We have heard Shri S. Kannan, learned DR for the Revenue, and Shri RC. Anand, Chartered Accountant for the respondents who are manufacturers of Cement tiles which were classified under heading 6807.00 "all other articles...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
impeller India Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
G Agarwal, M L Ram, R Kapoor
Jul-13-1995
Excise
(1995)(51)ECC89
1. Appearing on behalf of the appellants Shri Arun P. Patankar, Ld.counsel submitted that the appellants is a SSI Unit and the Revenue has already adjusted the amount of Rs. 50,000 which was imposed as redemption...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMysore Kirloskar Ltd. Vs. Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
T Nambiar, L Ram
Jan-19-1998
Service Tax
(1998)(59)ECC669
1. The present application is filed for the pre-deposit of the MODVAT credit of Rs. 40,85,343/-. The adjudicating authority allowed the benefit to the appellant. In allowing the benefit, the adjudicating authority at page 2 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMakkar and Loomba Vs. C.C.E.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
L Ram
Jul-24-1998
Land Acquisition
(1999)(63)ECC198
1. The question referred to me for determination in this appeal filed by M/s. Makkar & Loomba, New Delhi is whether the item--adhesive coated fabric was classifiable under sub-heading No. 5909.00 of the Central Excise Tariff...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce, Kanpur Vs. M/S. Mata Engg. Works and Bajrang
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Author: L Ram
Dec-12-2000
Service Tax
1. These are two appeals filed by the Revenue in which the issue involved is regarding the availment of modvat credit on the strength of the invoices which were not pre-printed with the Sl.Nos. Both the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce, Jaipur Vs. M/S Prem Cables (P) Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Author: L Ram
Jan-05-2001
Service Tax
1. The Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) with reference to the Tribunal's Final Order no. A/941/98-NB dated 16.7.1998 prayed that the following question of law be referred to the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court - "Can the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Impression Prints Vs. Cce, New Delhi
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Author: L Ram
Apr-10-2001
Excise
1. Under Stay Order No.S/480/2000 NB (DB) dated 20.11.2000 while hearing the stay application No.E/Stay/1708/2000 NB in Appeal No.E/2968/2000 NB filed by M/s. Impression Prints, the Tribunal had directed the appellants to pre-deposit a sum of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce, Chandigarh Vs. M/S. Jct Electronics
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Author: L Ram
Apr-11-2001
Service Tax
1. In this appeal filed by the Revenue the matter relates to the modvat credit taken by the respondents beyond the period of six months after the date of the invoice. Under Notification No.28/95-CE(NT)dated 29.6.95 it...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »