Advanced Search Results
Madanlal Lachmandas Vs. Kedarnath Shersinghdas
Mumbai
Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J. and ;N. Kemp, J.
Feb-04-1930
Civil
AIR1930Bom364; (1930)32BOMLR660
Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J.1. In this case we have before us two appeals from the learned Chamber Judge. Appeal No. 53 of 1929 is from an order of September 2, 1929, giving conditional leave to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLakhmichand Khetsey Punja Vs. Ratanbai
Mumbai
Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J. and Kemp, J.
Oct-11-1926
TenancyCivil
AIR1927Bom115; (1927)29BOMLR78
Amberson Marten, C.J.1. This case raises important and interesting questions of law as to the liability of a landlord to one of his tenants for the collapse on March 23, 1923, of part of a large...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdullabhai Lalji Vs. the Executive Committee
Mumbai
Stanley Batchelor, Kt., Acting C.J. and ;Kemp, J.
Feb-27-1918
Civil
AIR1918Bom200; (1918)20BOMLR639
Kemp, J.1. This is a reference from the Resident at Aden in an appeal in Suit No. 113 of 1914 filed in the Court of the Resident requesting the opinion of the High Court under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bai Nematbu Vs. Bai Nematullabu
Mumbai
Stanley Batchelor, Kt., Acting C.J. and ;Kemp, J.
Jan-09-1918
Limitation
AIR1918Bom228; (1918)20BOMLR434
Stanley Batchelor, Kt., Acting C.J.1. This is an appeal brought by the original 1st defendant against an order made by the learned First Class Subordinate Judge granting to the plaintiff a review of the Subordinate Judge's...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhagchand Dagadusa Vs. the Secretary of State for India
Mumbai
Lallubhai Shah, Kt., Acting C.J. and ;Kemp, J.
Aug-15-1923
Civil
(1924)26BOMLR1
Lallubhai Shah Ag. C.J.1. [His Lordship, after setting out the facts of the case, proceeded:] I shall first deal with the preliminary points raised in the arguments before us in appeal. The most important among them...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Standard Aluminium and Brass Works Ld.
Mumbai
Kemp, J.
Aug-24-1928
Company
(1928)30BOMLR1509; 114Ind.Cas.849
K. Kemp, J.1. This is a petition by a shareholder for winding up the Standard Aluminium and Brass Works, Limited. The company was registered in February 1920 with an authorised capital of 25 lacs divided into...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManeklal Mansukhbai Vs. the Saraspur Manufacturing Company Ltd.
Mumbai
Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J. and Kemp, J.
Aug-10-1926
Company
AIR1927Bom167; (1927)29BOMLR253; 101Ind.Cas.144
Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J.1. The question we have to decide is whether leave ought to be given to the appellant to continue against the respondent-company a suit No. 672 of 1924 filed by him in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPhillip A. Watkins Vs. Laxminarayen Basdeodas
Mumbai
Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J. and Kemp, J.
Aug-26-1926
Civil
(1927)29BOMLR131
Amberson Marten, C.J.1. This is an exceptional ease. The plaintiff an Indian merchant bought gold bullion through the defendants in London in May 1922. The bullion was shipped on SS. Egypt and was lost on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Dinshaw Maneckjee Petit Bart
Mumbai
Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J. and ;Kemp, J.
Nov-29-1926
Direct Taxation
AIR1927Bom371; (1927)29BOMLR447
Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J.1. For the financial year 1925-26, the assessee Sir Dinshaw Petit has been assessed for super-tax on an aggregate income of Rs. 11,35,302 arising in the previous year. Of this sum he objects...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.G. Lakhmidas and Co. Vs. Sir Dorab Tata
Mumbai
Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J. and Kemp, J.
Oct-06-1926
PropertyContract
AIR1927Bom195; (1927)29BOMLR19; 101Ind.Cas.229
Amberson Marten, C.J.1. This is a vendor and purchaser summons taken. out under Rule 212 by the present trustees of a deed of settlement dated March 8, 1889, as vendors to determine (1) whether they had...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »