Advanced Search Results
Explore Computers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cals Ltd. and anr.
Delhi
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.
Jul-03-2006
Contract
Companies Act, 1956; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1882 - Sections 105, 106, 107, 138 and 142; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28; Contract (Amendment) Act, 1996; Limitation Act, 1963; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 2, Rules 3 and 6
IV(2006)BC441; 2006(2)CTLJ12(Del); 131(2006)DLT477; 2006(90)DRJ480
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.1. The plaintiff is a private limited company incorporated and registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of sales and purchase of computers and network products. The defendant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. Sudhir Kumar Sharma Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Delhi
B.C. Patel, C.J. and; Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.
Feb-09-2005
Property
Limitation Act; Constitution of India - Article 226
119(2005)DLT13
B.C. Patel, C.J.1. The appellant registered himself under the HUDCO Scheme in the year 1979 and deposited the initial amount of Rs.4,500/-. The appellant was given priority no.8759 for MIG flat but claims that no communication...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBadri Prasad and ors. Vs. State
Allahabad
Kaul, J.
Oct-21-1952
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21, 21(9) and 353
AIR1953All494
ORDERKaul, J.1. Badri Prasad, Gur Prasad, Jagannath, Ram Prasad, Ram Singh and Mohammad Yakub were convicted by the Judicial Magistrate, Rae Bareili, for offence under Sections 147, 341/149 and 353/149, Penal Code. Under Section 147 they...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Tittar and anr. Vs. State
Allahabad
Kaul, J.
Oct-25-1952
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 103 and 439
AIR1953All506
ORDERKaul, J.1. Tittar Khatik and his son, Bhajan were convicted under Section 60 (b), U. P. Excise Act, and sentenced to six months' rigorous imprisonment. They preferred an appeal, which was unsuccessful. They have now come...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAhibaran Singh and anr. Vs. the State
Allahabad
Kaul, J.
Oct-10-1952
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 411; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 101 to 103; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 32
AIR1953All493
ORDERKaul, J.1. Ahibaran Singh and Gokaran were convicted by a Magistrate of the first Class, Hardoi, under Section 411, Penal Code, and sentenced to nine months' rigorous imprisonment each. An appeal preferred by them was dismissed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskH.S. Rainal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Jammu and Kashmir
S.S. Ahmed, C.J. and; M.L. Kaul, J.
Apr-06-1994
Civil
Jammu and Kashmir High Court Rules, 1975 - Rules 8 to 11; ;Jammu and Kashmir Constitution - Section 101; ;Constitution of India - Article 225
AIR1995J& K7
M.L. Kaul, J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal has arisen out of an order of Hon'ble the Chief Justice dated 11-2-1994, whereby Writ Petition No. 947 of 1991 title H.S. Rainal v. National Insurance Company has been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShree Digvijay Cement Co. Ltd. Vs. the State Trading Corporation of In ...
Delhi
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.
Mar-17-2006
ContractCivil
Companies Act, 1956; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 182, 185, 186, 187, 188 and 222; Import Trade Control Rules; Import Trade Control Regulations; Export Control Orders
AIR2006Delhi276; III(2006)BC405; 2006(2)CTLJ34(Del); 128(2006)DLT319; 2006(89)DRJ207
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.CS (OS) No. 561/19801. The plaintiff has filed a suit for recovery of the amounts spent on unutilised craft paper bags along with interest and legal expenses thereon amounting to Rs. 29,87,092/-. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGulmarg Restaurant Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Delhi
C.J. and; Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.
Apr-08-2005
Property
Transfer of Property Act - Sections 43; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Article 338
2005(1)CTLJ462(Del); 119(2005)DLT648; 2005(82)DRJ128
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.1. A public auction was held by the respondent DDA for shops in CSE, Basant Enclave Market, under self-financing group housing scheme on 25.07.1983. The appellant was the highest bidder for a restaurant-cum-shop...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNavnirman Co-operative Group Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Union of India ( ...
Delhi
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.
May-07-2003
Property
Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 11A(2); Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Delhi Co-operative Societies Rules, 1973; Nazul Land Rules - Rule 2(1)
2003IVAD(Delhi)101; 105(2003)DLT169; 2003(70)DRJ384
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, 1.The petitioners are group housing societies, which amongst others are stated to have been registered with the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) in 1983 for allotment of land. A common seniority list was prepared...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Autar Vs. Savitri Devi
Allahabad
S.K. Kaul, J.
Apr-16-1975
TenancyCivil
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105 and 106; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 27
AIR1976All515
S.K. Kaul, J.1. This is a defendant's appeal and it arises out of a suit brought by the plaintiff-respondent for possession by ejectment of the defendant from eight quarters situated in Aliganj, Ward Hassan-ganj, boundaries of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »