Advanced Search Results

Govind Sharma Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Judge : K Kumar, A Wadhwa, A T K.K.

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)(213)ELT585Tri(Mum.)bai

2. Appeal No. C/425/06 along with Stay Petition has been filed by Shri Bhagwan Sippy. The ld. Counsel for this appellant submitted that Shri Bhagwan Sippy is an employee of CHA. The appeal filed by this...

Hitendra Kumar U. Gadecha, Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Judge : K Kumar, A M Moheb

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (2005)(183)ELT366Tri(Mum.)bai

2. It is seen that it is a case of import of restricted goods (gold and silver bars) based on forged, cancelled and defaced licenses for clearances of the restricted goods at concessional rate of Customs...

Santosh Textile and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Judge : J Balasundaram, Vice, K Agarwal, S T Chittaranjan, K Kumar, T Anjaneyulu

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)(117)ECC350

2. All the appeals are disposed off by a common order as they involve the same questions of law.3. In so far as Shri B.P. Kotak and Shri Sunil Hemani are concerned the ld. Counsel has...

Rakesh Kumar Bhagat Vs. Commissioner of Customs, New

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Judge : A T V.K., K Kumar

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (2002)(82)ECC803

1. Shri Rakesh Kumar Bhagat has filed this appeal against the Adjudication Order No. 36/2000, dated 2-8-2000 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (General) New Delhi.2. Briefly stated the facts are that Friendly Video Vision, proprietorship...

Sunrise Structurals and Engg. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Judge : S T S.S., K Kumar

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2004)(117)LC307Tri(Mum.)bai

1. M/s. Sunrise Structural and Engg. Ltd. E/3284/02 (herein after referred to as Sunrise) M/s. KEC International Ltd. E/3185/02 (herein after referred to as KEC) M/s. Ramson Alloys (P) Ltd. E/3269/02 (herein after referred to as...

Rajiv Gupta and anr. Vs. Cc

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Judge : A T V.K., K Kumar

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2002)(103)LC210Tri(Delhi)

1. These are two appeals filed by the appellants viz. Shri Rajiv Gupta and Ajay Gupta against the Order-in-Original dated 2.9.1993 passed by the Collector of Customs, New Delhi imposing penalty of Rs. 50,000/- on Ajay...

Krishan Kumar Vs. Commissioner of Customs, New

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Judge : K Kumar

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2002)(142)ELT150TriDel

1. This is an appeal against the Order-in-Appeal No. HKS (638) A & R/2001, dated 7-8-2001 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), New Delhi upholding the order of the adjudicating authority by absolutely confiscating 5...

Radheshyam Kanoria Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Judge : K Kumar, S T C., A Wadhwa

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Heard both sides. These appeals have been filed against the 4 orders-in-original passed by the same Commissioner. The issue involved in all these appeals is the same. The Id. SDR appearing for the revenue submitted...

Shri Harish P. Pherwani, Shri Vs. Commissioner of Customs (P)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Judge : K Kumar, S T Chittaranjan

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Heard both sides. In this case, the customs officials intercepted two of the appellants Shri Prakash Jain and Shri Ashok Pahuja travelling on the impugned scooter and recovered assorted foreign currency equivalent to Rs. 14,26,267/-...

Vijay Bhav and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Judge : T Anjaneyulu, S T Chittaranjan, K Kumar

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)(108)ECC147

2. I have carefully considered the submissions made by both sides. The case facts have been narrated in detail in the order passed by Hon'ble Member (Judicial), therefore they need not be reiterated once again.The difference...