Advanced Search Results
Hitendra Kumar U. Gadecha, Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
K Kumar, A M Moheb
Mar-03-2005
Customs
(2005)(183)ELT366Tri(Mum.)bai
2. It is seen that it is a case of import of restricted goods (gold and silver bars) based on forged, cancelled and defaced licenses for clearances of the restricted goods at concessional rate of Customs...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovind Sharma Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
K Kumar, A Wadhwa, A T K.K.
Nov-06-2006
Service Tax
(2007)(213)ELT585Tri(Mum.)bai
2. Appeal No. C/425/06 along with Stay Petition has been filed by Shri Bhagwan Sippy. The ld. Counsel for this appellant submitted that Shri Bhagwan Sippy is an employee of CHA. The appeal filed by this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRakesh Kumar Bhagat Vs. Commissioner of Customs, New
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
A T V.K., K Kumar
Mar-27-2002
Customs
(2002)(82)ECC803
1. Shri Rakesh Kumar Bhagat has filed this appeal against the Adjudication Order No. 36/2000, dated 2-8-2000 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (General) New Delhi.2. Briefly stated the facts are that Friendly Video Vision, proprietorship...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shri Harish P. Pherwani, Shri Vs. Commissioner of Customs (P)
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
K Kumar, S T Chittaranjan
Jan-13-2006
Land Acquisition
1. Heard both sides. In this case, the customs officials intercepted two of the appellants Shri Prakash Jain and Shri Ashok Pahuja travelling on the impugned scooter and recovered assorted foreign currency equivalent to Rs. 14,26,267/-...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSantosh Textile and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
J Balasundaram, Vice, K Agarwal, S T Chittaranjan, K Kumar, T Anjaneyulu
Jan-08-2007
Service Tax
(2007)(117)ECC350
2. All the appeals are disposed off by a common order as they involve the same questions of law.3. In so far as Shri B.P. Kotak and Shri Sunil Hemani are concerned the ld. Counsel has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijay Kumar Vs. Tara Chand
Punjab and Haryana
M.K. Kumar, J.
Feb-19-2003
Tenancy
Haryana Urban Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1973 - Sections 15(2) and 15(6)
(2003)134PLR340
M.M. Kumar, J. 1. This petition filed under Sub Section 6 of Section 15 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction), Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), is directed against the judgment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajiv Gupta and anr. Vs. Cc
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
A T V.K., K Kumar
Jan-22-2002
Land Acquisition
(2002)(103)LC210Tri(Delhi)
1. These are two appeals filed by the appellants viz. Shri Rajiv Gupta and Ajay Gupta against the Order-in-Original dated 2.9.1993 passed by the Collector of Customs, New Delhi imposing penalty of Rs. 50,000/- on Ajay...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishan Kumar Vs. Commissioner of Customs, New
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
K Kumar
Feb-13-2002
Land Acquisition
(2002)(142)ELT150TriDel
1. This is an appeal against the Order-in-Appeal No. HKS (638) A & R/2001, dated 7-8-2001 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), New Delhi upholding the order of the adjudicating authority by absolutely confiscating 5...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGanesh Overseas and ors. Vs. Cc
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
N T C.N.B., K Kumar
May-28-2002
MRTP
(2002)(82)ECC630
1. These three appeals arise from and are directed against a common order in original No. 30/Commr/99-APP dated 31.12.99 passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Gujarat, Ahmedabad.2. The impugned order was passed in respect of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Bimal Kumar JaIn Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
S T S.S., K Kumar
Jan-30-2004
Land Acquisition
(2004)(94)ECC345
1. Shri S.S. Mani, Consultant appeared on behalf of the appellant and Shri A. Chopra, Ld. JDR appeared on behalf of the Revenue.2. The Ld. Consultant submitted that a penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs has been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »