Advanced Search Results
The Madurai District Central Co-operative Bank Limited Vs. the Joint C ...
Chennai
K. Chandru, J.
Mar-31-2010
Service
Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 4(2), 7(7) and 14; ;Industrial Disputes Act - Section 18
ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. Both the writ petitions were filed by the petitioner Management.2. In the first writ petition, challenge was to the order passed by the first respondent Appellate authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.Santhakumari Vs. Joint Director Hs
Chennai
K.Chandru
Feb-07-2013
Education
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :07. 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.Nos.19869 and 23932 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2012 R.Santhakumari .. Petitioner in W.P.No.19869 of 2012 Moongibai Goenka...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.Narayanan Vs. The Director of Social Welfare
Chennai
K.Chandru
Jan-27-2015
Land Acquisition
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:12. 10.2009 CORAM The Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.CHANDRU W.P.No.36115 of 2006 P.Narayanan .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director of Social Welfare & N.M.P., Chennai 5. 2.The Project Co-ordinator,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M. Sellamuthu and ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Secreta ...
Chennai
P.K. Misra and ;K. Chandru, JJ.
Feb-13-2009
Service
Constitution of India - Article 14
(2009)5MLJ673
ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. Heard Mr. L. Chandrakumar, learned Counsel representing Mr.S.Doraisamy for the petitioners and Mr. M. Vaidyanathan, learned standing Counsel for the respondent Electricity Board and perused the records.2. W.P. No. 40078 of 2005 was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSou.Sundaramoorthi Vs. the Commissioner of Police and ors.
Chennai
K.Chandru, J.
Mar-21-2011
Service
Tamil Nadu City Police Act - Section 41(4); Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967; Constitution of India - Article 19; National Security Act
ORDER1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking to challenge an order, dated 11.12.2010 issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Ambattur Range. By the impugned order, the petitioner's application to conduct a public...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.Suganya Vs. the Director of Government Examinations
Chennai
K.Chandru, J.
Apr-20-2012
Constitution
RTI Act - Sections 2(f)(2(i); Constitution Of India - Article 226
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of mandamus, directing the respondent herein to re-value the theory answer paper of the petitioner in Subject Code No.110 for the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.Ganaselvam. Vs. the District Educational Officer, Vellore District. ...
Chennai
K.Chandru, J.
Apr-24-2012
Constitution
Constitution Of India - Article 226
This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the entire records of the proceedings in orally transferring the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskElangovan V.S Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission
Chennai
A.P. Shah; K. Chandru, Jj.
Nov-23-2006
Constitution
Constitution Of India - Articles 15, 16, 226, 315, 320
K. Chandru, J.1. Provoked by the Advertisement No. 84 given by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Com­mission (for short 'TNPSC') and the gross in-justice done to the Dalit converts to Buddhism, the petitioner, a Professor of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.Tamilarasi Vs. the Director, Directorate of Teacher Education Resear ...
Chennai
K.Chandru, J.
Apr-20-2012
Constitution
Constitution Of India - Article 226
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation for revaluation of her answer papers for D.T.Ed., course for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Principal Vs. P.Thangam.
Chennai
K.Chandru, J.
Mar-22-2012
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(4); Industrial Dispute Rules, 1958 - Rule 48(2), 10-B(9)
O R D E R1. This is a very unfortunate case and for wrong reasons, the parties are before this Court. The petitioner is Kendriya Vidyalaya School, Kattobomman, Vijayanarayanam, Nanguneri Taluk, represented by its Principal. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »