Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Judge: jeevan reddy j · Page 1 of about 67 results (0.029 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 19 1988

Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Rajahmundry and ors. Vs. Duncan ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Judge : B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.

Decided on : Feb-19-1988

Subject : Excise

Acts : Finance Act

Reported in : 1988(35)ELT308(AP)

ORDERJeevan Reddy, J.1. W.P. No. 3474/1982 was filed by (i) Duncans Agro-Industries Ltd., and (ii) Narendra Kumar Jain (who was described as a share-holder of the 1st petitioner Company), for issuance of an appropriate writ, order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 1981

Sri Vijaya Cotton Traders and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Judge : Alladi Kuppuswami, C.J. and ;Jeevan Reddi, J.

Decided on : Mar-13-1981

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(1), 3, 4, 4(2), 4(3), 4(4), 7, 7(6), 12, 12(1), 14, 16(2), 33 and 34; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 265; Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Rules - Rule 86D; Madras Commercial Crops Markets Act; Rajasthan Panchayat Act - Sections 64(1); Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act - Sections 37; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 3A, 81 and 81(1); Bombay Public Trusts Act - Sections 58; Law of Property Act, 1925; Madras General Sales Tax Act - Sections 19(4)

Reported in : AIR1981AP203

Alladi Kuppuswami, C.J.1. The petitioners in these Writ Petitions are merchants carrying on business in various parts of Andhra Pradesh. The main prayer in these Writ Petitions is to declare the Notification dated 21-1-1978 published in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 1976

Prabhakara Oil Mills Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Judge : S. Obul Reddi, C.J. and ;Jeevan Reddy, J.

Decided on : Mar-05-1976

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1976]38STC449(AP)

Jeevan Reddy, J.1.The petitioner (assessee) challenges the correctness of the Tribunal's order in T.A. No. 487 of 1974 in this tax revision case.2. The petitioner is a dealer in foodgrains. He submitted a return for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 20 1993

Election Commission of India Vs. State of T.N. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Judge : M.N. Venkatachaliah, C.J. and; B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.

Decided on : Aug-20-1993

Subject : Election

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 324

Reported in : 1995Supp(3)SCC379

M.N. Venkatachaliah, C.J. and; B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. We have heard Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned Senior Counsel for the State of Tamil Nadu in support of IA No. 7 and Shri G. Ramaswamy, learned Senior Counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 1978

S. Johny Saheb and ors. Vs. Ademma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Judge : S. Obul Reddi, C.J. and ;Jeevan Reddy, J.

Decided on : Apr-03-1978

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110-A and 110-D

Reported in : AIR1978AP447

Jeevan Reddy, J. 1. This appeal is preferred against the order of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chittoor condoning the delay in filing a claim petition. The claim petition was filed under S. 110-A of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1988

Lalchand Surana and ors. Vs. Hyderabad Vanaspathy Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Judge : B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.

Decided on : Mar-11-1988

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 80(1), 85 and 433

Reported in : [1990]68CompCas415(AP)

Jeevan Reddy, J.1. This petition is filed by three shareholders of Hyderabad Vanaspathy Ltd., a public limited company, having its registered office at Hyderabad, for winding up the company on the ground that it is unable...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 1978

Jay Engineering Works Ltd. Vs. Government of India, Ministry of Financ ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Judge : S. Obul Reddi, C.J. and ;Jeevan Reddy, J.

Decided on : Mar-31-1978

Subject : Excise

Acts : Finance Act, 1969; Finance Act, 1951 - Sections 6(2) and 7(2); Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 37; Indian Tariff Act, 1934 - Sections 2(A) and 32; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 10, 10A, 56, 56A, 56A(2) and 56A(3)

Reported in : 1979(4)ELT307(AP)

Jeevan Reddy, J.1. This writ appeal is preferred against the judgment of Gangadhara Rao, J., dismissing the Writ Petition.2. The petitioner-appellant manufactures, inter alia, electric fans. Two of the components, namely, stators and rotors, are not...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 1976

Sri Vijayalakshmi Rice Mill Contractors Company Vs. the State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Judge : S. Obul Reddi, C.J. and ;Jeevan Reddy, J.

Decided on : Feb-11-1976

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1976]38STC19(AP)

Jeevan Reddy, J.1. A common question arises for decision in both these tax revision cases, which, therefore, can be disposed of by a common order.2. It would be sufficient if we state the facts in T.R.C....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 1982

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shaik Jaffer and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Judge : B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.

Decided on : Mar-02-1982

Subject : Company

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 96(2); Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules, 1964 - Rule 213

Reported in : [1984]56CompCas79(AP)

Jeevan Reddy, J.1. These four civil miscellaneour appeals are preferred by the insurance company, questioning the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal. The Contention of Mr. I.A.Naidu is that, on the findings recorded by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 1978

Keesara Yogananda Sarma Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Judge : Jeevan Reddy, J.

Decided on : Apr-13-1978

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944; Central Excise Rules - Rules 9, 19, 24, 29, 140 and 152 to 156B

Reported in : 1980(6)ELT612(AP)

ORDERJeevan Reddy J.1. Plaintiff is the appellant. His suit is for a declaration that the levy of excise duty in a sum ofRs. 15,543/- is illegal, and void and for a consequential injunction to restrain the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial