Advanced Search Results
Rosemount (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
S T Gowri, J S Murthy
Sep-22-1999
MRTP
(2000)(67)ECC349
1. The question for the consideration is the valuation of goods imported by the appellant from M/s Rosemount Inc. USA. In the order impugned in the appeal, the Collector (Appeals) has confirmed the finding of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNewpar Aromatics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
K Venkataramani, Vice-President, J S Murthy
May-20-1998
Service Tax
(1998)(62)ECC353
1. Appellants manufacture bon acid falling under Chapter 29 Central Excise Tariff Act. They are availing of modvat credit on their input beta naphthol used in the manufacture of bon acid. The input supplier was availing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUsv Ltd. and anr. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
K Venkataramani, Vice-, J S Murthy
Jun-13-1998
Excise
(1998)(79)LC67Tri(Mum.)bai
1. The application is for waiver of pre-deposit of duty amount of Rs. 45,79,143 and an equal amount as penalty under Section 11AC of CEA. The other application is by the Managing Director of the applicant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shailesh D. Shah Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
J S Murthy
Jan-27-1999
Land Acquisition
(2006)STR29
1. The appellant/applicant has filed the stay application praying for staying the impugned order pending disposal of the appeal, on the ground that he has already paid the service tax, and also the penalty imposed in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDangi Financial and Management Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
J S Murthy
Apr-01-1999
Service Tax
(2006)STR36
1. The applicants have requested for the stay of the impugned order and dispensing with the pre-deposit of the penalty amounting to Rs. 4,500/- imposed thereunder, in view of the appeal grounds urged that the delay...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahavir Butyl Rubber Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
J S Murthy
Feb-22-2000
Excise
(2000)(70)ECC583
1. Applicant has sought for the waiver of pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 3,85,320 and penalty of Rs. 1,00,000 and for the stay of recovery of the same.2. The brief facts of the case are that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWeldkar Laminaters P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
V T K.S., J S Murthy
Mar-03-1997
Excise
(1997)(70)LC817Tri(Mum.)bai
1. The appellants herein were availing of proforma credit under Rule 56-A prior to 1.3.1986 and they had opted for operating under modvat credit scheme after 1.3.1986 under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules. Differential...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGirish K. Shah Vs. Cc
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
V T K.S., J S Murthy
Jul-23-1997
Customs
(1997)(72)LC584Tri(Mum.)bai
1. The applicant was directed to deposit a sum of Rs. two lakhs by the stay order dated 19.10.1992. After depositing Rs. 50,000/- there was no further deposit by this applicant. His appeal was, therefore, dismissed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMirc Electronics Ltd. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
V T K.S., J S Murthy
Jan-30-1998
Service Tax
(1998)(75)LC272Tri(Mum.)bai
1. After hearing the Id. counsel for the applicants and the Id. SDR for the department, we find that the appeal has to be remanded. The impugned order makes out that the Commissioner of Central Excise...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Broach Textile Mills Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
K Venkataramani, Vice-, J S Murthy
Mar-30-1998
Excise
(1998)(62)ECC355
1. This is an appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise Vadodara, on a direction under Section 35-E (1) of the Central Excise Act 1944, from the Central Board of Excise & Customs, to apply...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »