Advanced Search Results
Newpar Aromatics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
K Venkataramani, Vice-President, J S Murthy
May-20-1998
Service Tax
(1998)(62)ECC353
1. Appellants manufacture bon acid falling under Chapter 29 Central Excise Tariff Act. They are availing of modvat credit on their input beta naphthol used in the manufacture of bon acid. The input supplier was availing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUsv Ltd. and anr. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
K Venkataramani, Vice-, J S Murthy
Jun-13-1998
Excise
(1998)(79)LC67Tri(Mum.)bai
1. The application is for waiver of pre-deposit of duty amount of Rs. 45,79,143 and an equal amount as penalty under Section 11AC of CEA. The other application is by the Managing Director of the applicant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShailesh D. Shah Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
J S Murthy
Jan-27-1999
Land Acquisition
(2006)STR29
1. The appellant/applicant has filed the stay application praying for staying the impugned order pending disposal of the appeal, on the ground that he has already paid the service tax, and also the penalty imposed in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dangi Financial and Management Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
J S Murthy
Apr-01-1999
Service Tax
(2006)STR36
1. The applicants have requested for the stay of the impugned order and dispensing with the pre-deposit of the penalty amounting to Rs. 4,500/- imposed thereunder, in view of the appeal grounds urged that the delay...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRosemount (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
S T Gowri, J S Murthy
Sep-22-1999
MRTP
(2000)(67)ECC349
1. The question for the consideration is the valuation of goods imported by the appellant from M/s Rosemount Inc. USA. In the order impugned in the appeal, the Collector (Appeals) has confirmed the finding of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRoshanlal B. JaIn and anr. Vs. Cc (P)
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
J T J.H., J S Murthy
Jan-21-1999
MRTP
(1999)(85)LC181Tri(Mum.)bai
1. These two appeals are filed by the party against the above captioned impugned order dated 25.5.1993 of the respondent praying for setting aside the same and for such other orders as deemed fit.1.1. The facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSharp Engineers Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
J T J.H., J S Murthy
Aug-03-1999
Land Acquisition
(2000)(67)ECC628
1. This application for early hearing was argued by Shri R.K. Ghadge, Consultant. Shri K.L. Ramteke appeared for the Revenue.2. In the impugned order the Commissioner directed that the interest on deposit taken by the assessees...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahavir Butyl Rubber Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
J S Murthy
Feb-22-2000
Excise
(2000)(70)ECC583
1. Applicant has sought for the waiver of pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 3,85,320 and penalty of Rs. 1,00,000 and for the stay of recovery of the same.2. The brief facts of the case are that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPremier Automobiles Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
K Venkataramani, Vice-, J S Murthy
Apr-16-1998
Service Tax
(1998)(62)ECC76
1. The above mentioned appeals are directed against the captioned order of the Commissioner of Cen. Excise (Adjudication), Mumbai.2. The appellants are manufacturing motor vehicles. Show cause notices were issued to them proposing to add interest...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYork Exports Vs. Cc
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
J T J.H., J S Murthy
Jan-07-1999
Land Acquisition
(1999)(85)LC270Tri(Mum.)bai
1. The applicants in this case, exported 18 consignments of Mohair Polyester Blended Knitwear, giving the composition of 70% Mohair and 30% Polyester against Advance Licence earlier obtained. The test reports showed that in two consignments...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »