Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Judge: j p devadhar j · Page 1 of about 47 results (0.044 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 10 2008

icici Bank Limited Vs. Tata International Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Swatanter Kumar, C.J. and ;J.P. Devadhar, J.

Decided on : Apr-10-2008

Subject : Contract

Acts : General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 10; Summary Jurisdiction Act, 1857; Sunday Observance Act, 1677

Reported in : 2008(6)MhLj446

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. Whether a bank guarantee valid for 90 days, can be invoked on the 91st day, if the 90th day happens to be a public holiday or a Sunday is the question raised in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2008

Korvi R.S. Vs. Peico Electronics and Electricals Ltd. and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Judge : J.P. Devadhar, J.

Decided on : Apr-29-2008

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 341, 342 and 352

Reported in : (2009)ILLJ135Bom

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. In this petition Part-I award and Part II award passed by the Labour Court, Pune on January 18, 1993 and April 20, 1995 respectively are challenged. By the Part-I award, the Labour Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2008

Prs Permacel Private Limited Vs. Johnson and Johnson Employees Union a ...

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Swatanter Kumar, C.J. and ;J.P. Devadhar, J.

Decided on : Jul-31-2008

Subject : CompanyLabour and Industrial

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10, 10(1), 10(2), 12, 12(5) and 12(6); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 2008(5)ALLMR505; (2008)IIILLJ973Bom

Swatanter Kumar, C.J.1. PRS Permacel Private Limited, a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that the Court be pleased...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 15 2005

Dena Bank Vs. Venugopal Nair

Court : Mumbai

Judge : J.P. Devadhar, J.

Decided on : Jul-15-2005

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 66 and 66(6)

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR340; [2006(107)FLR655]; 2005(4)MhLj900

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. By the impugned award dated 5th June, 2003, the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1, Mumbai has directed the petitioner bank to reinstate the respondent workman and absorb him permanently as a regular...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 2008

Mr.Mahesh Varma, Director of Michigan Rubber India Limited and Michiga ...

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Swatanter Kumar, C.J. and ;J.P. Devadhar, J.

Decided on : Mar-27-2008

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1)

Reported in : 2009(1)BomCR448; 2008(4)MhLj657

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the pre qualification criteria attached to a technical tender invited by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) mainly on the ground that the same...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 2005

Khadi and Village Industries Commission Gramodaya Vs. Jagdish Prasad P ...

Court : Mumbai

Judge : J.P. Devadhar, J.

Decided on : Jul-15-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industries Commission Act, 1956; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F

Reported in : 2006(2)ALLMR699; 2006(1)BomCR868; [2005(107)FLR357]; 2005(4)MhLj527

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. The petitioner challenges the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 at Bombay dated 23-7-2003. By this Award, the petitioner is directed to reinstate the respondent with effect from 1-11-1999 with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2007

Kirloskar Power Equipments Limited (Formerly Known as Voltas Transform ...

Court : Mumbai

Judge : H.L. Gokhale, Acting C.J. and ;J.P. Devadhar, J.

Decided on : Feb-22-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 52, 269UC(3), 269UD, 269UD(1), 269UD(1A); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 40; Specific Relief Act, 1963; Urban Land Ceiling Act - Sections 20; Income Tax Rules - Rules 2 and 60; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 142 and 226

Reported in : 2007(4)BomCR841; (2007)210CTR(Bom)317

H.L. Gokhale, Acting C.J.1. This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks to challenge and set aside the order dated 23rd February 1995 passed by respondent Nos. 1 to 3, whereby the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2008

Kishore Chandrakant Shah Vs. State of Maharashtra Through the Secretar ...

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Swatanter Kumar, C.J. and ;J.P. Devadhar, J.

Decided on : Mar-13-2008

Subject : Contract

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR230; 2008(3)BomCR271; 2008(3)MhLj760

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of parties, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing.2. The short question raised in this Public Interest Litigation ('PIL' for short) is, where the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 2008

Shree Ostwal Builders Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Companies ...

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Swatanter Kumar, C.J. and J.P. Devadhar, J.

Decided on : Mar-27-2008

Subject : Contract

Acts : MHADA Act, 1976; Right to Information Act (RTI), 2004; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR529; 2008(3)BomCR36; (2008)110BOMLR1209; 2008(4)MhLj404

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. The challenge in these two cases, is to the public tender issued by the Government on 20-5-2007 in so far as it relates to inviting tenders by invoking the Swiss Challenge Method. 2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 2005

Burroughs Wellcome (i) Ltd. Vs. Jagannath Namdeo Patel,

Court : Mumbai

Judge : J.P. Devadhar, J.

Decided on : Jul-12-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labor Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28 and 29; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 18(1); Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 - Rule 62

Reported in : 2006(1)BomCR812; 2005(4)MhLj57

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. The short point raised in this petition is, whether the employees who have availed the benefits under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) by expressly declaring that they shall have no claim or any...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial