Advanced Search Results

Shivram Govind Darshane Vs. Viswanath Govind Darshane

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Gajendragadkar, J.

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1956)58BOMLR154

Gajendragadkar, J.1. This revisional application raises a short and interesting question of law under Section 23 read with Section 218 of the Indian Contract Act. The unfortunate incidents that followed the assassination of Gandhiji are ultimately...

Ebrahim Saleji Vs. Abdulla Ali Reza and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Gajendragadkar, J.

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 28 and 29; Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 41 and 45

Reported in : AIR1951Bom294; (1950)52BOMLR897

ORDERGajendragadkar, J. 1. The short question which this revn. appln. raises relates to the scope & proper effect of the provisions of Sections 28 & 29, Bombay Act LVII [57] of 1947. It is a question...

Shiddu Rama Shagale Vs. Basawa Ramayya Swami

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Gajendragadkar, J.

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1956)58BOMLR1

Gajendragadkar, J.1. This rivisional application raises a very short point under Section 32 (2) (v) of the Bombay Agricultural Debtors Relief Act. The petitioner is one of the two creditors of Basawa. It appears that on...

Basalingappa Sangappa Nesargi Vs. the Province of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Gajendragadkar, J.

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1955)57BOMLR235

Gajendragadkar, J.1. This is a second appeal by the plaintiff and it raises a short and interesting question of law. The land in suit is survey No. 46. It measures 6 acres and 17 gunthas and...

Parvatibai Shankar Pathaki Vs. Anandrao Pathaki

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Gajendragadkar, J.

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1948Bom159; (1947)49BOMLR789

Gajendragadkar, J.1. This appeal arises in execution proceedings and raises a short interesting question as to the proper denotation of the word 'avalad'. The decree which is the subject-matter of these execution proceedings was passed in...

Mallappa Rachappa Shetgan and ors. Vs. Shivappa Tammanna Hadnur and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Gajendragadkar, J.

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 65A and 66

Reported in : AIR1950Bom71

Gajendragadkar, J.1. The short question which arises in this appeal is whether a permanent lease executed by the mortgagor during the pendency of a simple mortgage binds the mortgagee or persons claiming through him. This question...

Narmadabai Narayanshet Shet Vs. Hidayatalli Saheballi

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Gajendragadkar, J.

Subject : LimitationCivil

Reported in : (1948)50BOMLR696

Gajendragadkar, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the surety against the order passed by the learned District Judge holding that the darkhast filed against the surety is in time and directing the Court of first...

Karfule Ltd. Vs. Arical Daniel Varghese

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Chagla, C.J. and ;Gajendragadkar, J.

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order XLI, Rule 33; Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 13, 14, 15 and 35 - Schedule - Article 17; Indian Succession Act - Sections 380; Presidency Small Cause Courts Act - Sections 73; Bombay City Civil Court Act - Sections 11(1); Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Rules, 1948 - Rules 14(4) and 15(3); City Civil Court Act - Sections 11(2);

Reported in : AIR1953Bom73; (1952)54BOMLR664; ILR1953Bom170

Chagla, C.J.(1) This is an application for refund of court-fees. An appeal was preferred to this Court from a decree of the City Civil Court, and the appeal was compromised out of Court. The appellants have...

Mangilal Kajodimal Vs. Shankar Shravan Nikam

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Gajendragadkar, J.

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1956)58BOMLR107

Gajendragadkar, J.1.This revisional application raises a short and interesting question of law. An order for restitution had been passed against the petitioner by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Jalgaon. The petitioner preferred an appeal against...

Sinaeen MohiddIn Malbari Vs. Kaushal Kishore Bhagwandas Sharma

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Gajendragadkar, J.

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1956)58BOMLR339

Gajendragadkar, J.1. These two revisional applications raise a short question about the proper Court-fees leviable on cross-objections preferred by the tenants in both the cases. The learned District Judge, before whom these cross-objections were preferred, has...