Advanced Search Results
Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Indian Rayon and Industries Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
J T J.H., G Srinivasan, S T Gowri
Apr-01-2003
Excise
(2003)(159)ELT896Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This is an appeal filed by the department against the decision of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai made in Order-in-Appeal No. PCJ-697/B.III/94, dated 5-12-1994 whereunder he set aside the order passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssociated Cement Co. Ltd. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
G Srinivasan, S T S.S.
Nov-17-2000
Service Tax
(2001)(96)LC176Tri(Mum.)bai
1. These two appeals have been filed against the orders dated 30.12.1997 and 20.12.1996 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-IV and Mumbai-III.Appeal No. E/688/98-Bom Order-in-OriginalNo. 27/97 Dated 30.12.1997Appeal No. E/640/98-Bom Order-in-OriginalNo. 284/96 dated 20.12.1996)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNav Maharashtra Chakan Oil Mills Vs. Cc
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
S T Gowri, G Srinivasan
Jan-16-2002
Customs
(2002)(104)LC549Tri(Mum.)bai
1.These two appeals have been filed against two different orders. C.165/91 has been filed against the decision of Collector of Central Excise and Customs, Pune made in Sr. No. 1/Cus/1991 dated 8.1.1991, whereunder the Collector had...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Lakhanpal National Ltd. and H. Ono Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Cen ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
S T Gowri, G Srinivasan
Sep-02-2002
MRTP
1. Lakhanpal National Ltd., the assessee, was engaged at the relevant time in the manufacture of dry battery and electrical storage battery.There was dispute between the assessee and the department as to the admissibility of certain...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParle Beverages Ltd. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
J T J.H., G Srinivasan
Jul-16-1999
Service Tax
(1999)(85)LC604Tri(Mum.)bai
1. In these four appeals the question involved is whether plastic crates used in relation to manufacture of aerated waters is eligible for modvat credit or not.2. In the above appeals, appeal No. E/1307 and E/1308-V/97...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssociated Cement Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
G Srinivasan, S T S.S.
Nov-17-2000
Service Tax
(2001)(74)ECC509
1. These two appeals have been filed against the orders dated 30.12.97 and 20.12.96 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai -IV and Mumbai-III.2. These appeals have been filed by the appellants who are engaged...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSupreme Industries Ltd. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
S T Gowri, G Srinivasan
Mar-31-1999
Excise
(1999)(84)LC172Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This is an appeal filed by the appellant against the decision dated 27.1.1994 made in Order-in-Appeal No. PCJ-22/B. 111/94 whereunder for the purpose of the valuation of the product the excise duty paid on input...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEssenjay Marketing P. Ltd. Vs. Cc
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
J T J.H., G Srinivasan
Apr-12-1999
Land Acquisition
(1999)(84)LC624Tri(Mum.)bai
1. These two appeals are filed by the same appellants. The facts being identical, these are being disposed of vide this single order.2. The appellants are indenting agents for machinery. On the basis of orders processed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRex Arts Castors Pvt. Ltd., Rex Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
S T Gowri, G Srinivasan
Jun-24-2003
Land Acquisition
(2004)(177)ELT179Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This bunch of six appeals (Appeals E/4596 to 4601/95) have been filed by the assessee against the decision dated 18.4.1994 made by the Collector of Central Excise-II, Mumbai-I, in Order-in-Original No.53/1994, confirming the duty. By...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Jay Hind Industries Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
J T J.H., G Srinivasan
May-13-1999
Excise
(1999)(66)ECC452
1. M/s. Jay Hind Industries Ltd. manufactured aluminium castings.Defective castings are received for reconditioning etc. in terms of Rule 173H. The reconditioning involved melting of the defective aluminium castings. The Assistant Collector held that such process...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »