Advanced Search Results
Graphite India Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
V T K.S., G B Deva
Oct-11-1993
Excise
(1994)(54)LC273Tri(Delhi)
1. This is an Appeal preferred agains the Order-in-Appeal dt. 16.8.1985 passed by the Collector (Appeals), Calcutta.2. The point to be decided in this case is whether 'Head Blocks' manufactured by the Appellants for captive consumption...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommr. of Cus. (Airport) Vs. Shasun Chemicals and Drugs Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
S Peeran, G B Deva, R K Jeet
Mar-11-2003
Customs
(2002)LC173Tri(Chennai)
1. This is an appeal filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Airport), Chennai against the order-in-original No. 8/2001 (Commr. Air), dated 9-2-2001 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Airport), Chennai, on the direction of the Central...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askitel Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
G B Deva, S T S.S., N T C.N.B.
Oct-10-2003
Service Tax
(2004)(93)ECC639
1. These are two appeals. Appeal No. E/701/2002 is filed by the appellants, M/s. ITEL Industries Pvt. Ltd. whereas the appeal No.E/902/2002 is filed by Revenue, against the impugned order passed by the Commissioner of Customs...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of C. Ex., Bangalore Vs. Astra Idl Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
G B Deva, S T S.S.
Jan-15-2002
Service Tax
(2002)(141)ELT741Tri(Bang.)
G.A. Brahma Deva, Member (J) - These are two appeals filed by the Revenue with reference to respective impugned orders involving common issue. They are therefore taken together and being disposed of by this common order.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce Vs. Nestle India Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
G B Deva
Apr-18-2002
Service Tax
(2002)(105)LC149Tri(Bang.)alore
G.A. Brahma Deva, Member (J) 1. Whether the following items are eligible capital goods in terms of Rule 57Q is an issue to be considered herein. 1) PVC Insulated cables and wires 2) Armoured cables 5)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAdwaiath Steels Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
S Peeran, R K Jeet, G B Deva
Mar-19-2003
Excise
(2003)(156)ELT519Tri(Chennai)
1. This is an application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 31,48,359/- confirmed in terms of Rule 9(2) read with proviso to Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, besides mandatory penalty of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.S. Tobacco Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
G B Deva, M T K.C.
Oct-07-2003
Land Acquisition
(2004)(92)ECC159
1. G.A. Brahma Deva, Member (J) (Oral) - After hearing for some time with reference the stay petition filed by the party we find that the matter itself can be disposed of on the limited issue....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhillai Conductors (P) Ltd. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
G B Deva, J T J.H.
Jan-14-2000
Excise
(2000)(69)ECC192
1. On a visit to the appellants' factory, the jurisdictional officers found super enamelled coper wire on spools and also packed in containers which were stepped (sic) [stripped] and labelled which wires were not entered in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Siri Sri Plastics (P) Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
G B Deva, S T S.S.
Jul-05-2002
Service Tax
(2002)(83)ECC710
2. M/s. Siri Sri Plastics (P) Ltd. the Respondents herein, are manufacturers of co-extruded LDPE films and were alleged to have illegally availed SSI exemption for the years 1991-92, 92-93 as their clearances were found to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBinjrajka Steel Tubes Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
G B Deva, S T S.S.
Oct-11-2002
Land Acquisition
(2003)(85)ECC436
1. The appellants are manufacturers of Steel Tubes and they were registered with the Directorate General of Technical Development (hereinafter referred to as D.G.T.D). Under the licence they had been availing exemption under the provisions of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »