Advanced Search Results

State of M.P. Vs. R.P. Gupta, Advocate

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Judge : R.B. Dixit, J.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 439

Reported in : 2000(1)MPHT509

ORDERR.B. Dixit, J.1. A letter of reference was received from the Third Additional Judge to Sessions Judge, Bhind seeking direction as to which of the order of this Court has to be implemented whereunder in Misc....

Jagdish Narayan Dixit Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Judge : R.B. Dixit, J.

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2002(1)MPHT232

ORDERR.B. Dixit, J. 1. The learned counsel of the petitioner has submitted that the then UpAyukta Nagar Nigam, Gwalior Dr. Hari had directed him to encash the amount of cheque which stood in his name and...

Ramkrishna Vs. State

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Judge : Shinde, C.J. and ;Dixit, J.

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1956CriLJ1073

Dixit, J.1. The facts of this reference by the learned Sessions Judge of Gwalior are that three separate cases have been instituted in the Court of Additional City Magistrate, Gwalior against Ramkrishna in respect of offences...

Mahesh Chandra @ Mahesh Kumar Goyal Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Judge : R.B. Dixit, J.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 437, 438 and 439

Reported in : 2000(2)MPHT232; 2000(3)MPLJ417

ORDERR.B. Dixit, J.2. Heard learned counsel of the applicant and the learned Dy. Govt. Advocate for State. 3. This application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been marked on the top of the title page as 2nd...

Champrajbhai Harsurbhai Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Judge : M.C. Chagla, C.J. and ;Dixit, J.

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1954)56BOMLR1072

M.C. Chagla, C.J.1. This is a petition by the Mulgirasias of the Amreli district and by this petition they challenge the validity of Act XLV of 1953. In substance, the effect of the Act is to...

Bank of India Vs. John Bowman and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Chagla, C.J. and ;Dixit, J.

Subject : Banking

Acts : Bombay City Land Revenue Act, 1876 - Sections 8, 9, 10, 11, 13 and 37; Constiution of India - Articles 13, 14, 226 and 372(1); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 54; Land Revenue Code (Amendment) Act, 1913 - Sections 1(2); Income-tax Act - Sections 46 and 151; Revenue Recovery Act, 1890 - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR1955Bom305; (1955)57BOMLR345; ILR1955Bom402

Chagla, C.J. 1. This is a petition by the Bank of India challenging an attachment levied by the Collector of Bombay under Section 13, Bombay City Land Revenue Act, 1876, and also requiring the Court to...

Ganpati Maruti Vs. Anandrao Maruti and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Dixit, J.

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Law; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 20, Rule 12

Reported in : AIR1954Bom384; (1954)56BOMLR317

FACTS 1. One Hari Patlu, who owned certain survey numbers and a house, died on October 23, 1918. The pedigree of the family to which Hari Patlu belonged was as follows: APPAJI | --------------------------- | |...

Genuji Ramji and anr. Vs. Murlidhar Laxman and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Dixit, J.

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 36, 116 and 120; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 76; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 105(2) - Order 2, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1954Bom417; (1954)56BOMLR462; ILR1954Bom1131

Dixit, J.1. This appeal arises from a suit filed by the plaintiffs-appellants to recover from the defendants-respondents a sum of Rs. 550 with future interest and costs.2. On 30-10-1880, a possessory mortgage was executed by one...

State of Bombay Vs. Antony Marshall Montero

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Dixit, J.

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1954)56BOMLR43

Dixit, J.1. This is an application in revision from an order of conviction and sentence passed upon the applicant for an offence under Section 122(d) of the Bombay Police Act, 1951. The accused was prosecuted for,...

The State of Bombay Vs. Amratlal Ambaram Modi

Court : Mumbai

Judge : Dixit, J.

Subject : Municipal Tax

Reported in : (1957)59BOMLR1129

Dixit, J.1. These three appeals raise a common question about the proper construction of the second proviso to Section 22 of the Bombay Finance Act, 1932. It would be enough to state the facts in S.A....