Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Judge: dilip kumar seth j · Page 1 of about 33 results (0.064 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 09 2002

Bhaskar Mondal Vs. Uco Bank and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Judge : Dilip Kumar Seth, J.

Decided on : Apr-09-2002

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : General Clauses Act, 1887 - Sections 3(38) and 26; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 220, 221 and 300; ;Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 20, 20(3) and 226; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 409

Reported in : (2002)2CALLT574(HC)

Dilip Kumar Seth, J. Submission of the petitioner : 1. Out of the self-same set of allegations, the respondents had initiated a departmental proceedings, as well as had lodged FIR, on the basis whereof, after investigation,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2002

Golam Momen Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Judge : Dilip Kumar Seth, J.

Decided on : May-10-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132, 158BC, 220(6) and 226(3); ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Dilip Kumar Seth, J.Submission on behalf of the petitioner :1. On a premise of preferring an appeal against an order of assessment, the petitioner had prayed for stay of operation of the demand by an application...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2001

Sarla Gems Ltd. and anr. Vs. Board for Industrial and Financial Recons ...

Court : Kolkata

Judge : Dilip Kumar Seth, J.

Decided on : Jan-09-2001

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1), 15(1), 18 and 18(1); ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2002]108CompCas663(Cal)

Dilip Kumar Seth, J.1. The petitioner-company Sarla Gems Ltd. having become sick as defined in the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (SICA), was referred on September 8, 1998, under Section 15(1) of the SICA...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 12 2002

Anoop Kumar Vs. Commissioner of Cus. (Prev.)

Court : Kolkata

Judge : Dilip Kumar Seth, J.

Decided on : Apr-12-2002

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(33), 125, 130(1) and 143; ;Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 - Rule 41; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(93)ECC149,2002LC316(Calcutta),2002(145)ELT48(Cal)

Dilip Kumar Seth, J.Facts :1. Certain goods were imported under a special import licence. These are described as walkie-talkie toys. The customs authority had refused to release the goods on the ground that those are not...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 2002

Uniworth Textiles Ltd. Vs. Joint Development Commissioner

Court : Kolkata

Judge : Dilip Kumar Seth, J.

Decided on : May-02-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 - Sections 9(2), 9(4) and 13; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 35F

Reported in : 2002LC325(Calcutta),2002(144)ELT515(Cal)

ORDERDilip Kumar Seth, J.1. The Subject:The proceeding under the Excise Act was initiated under Section HA against the petitioner company having its office at Calcutta in respect of certain excise duty payable on account of certain...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2002

Rakesh Kumar Shaw Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Kolkata

Judge : Dilip Kumar Seth, J.

Decided on : May-10-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Income-Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 246, 249(2), 249(3), 250, 253, 269SS, 271D and 273B

Reported in : [2002]257ITR268(Cal)

Dilip Kumar Seth, J. 1. Facts and submissions : Aggrieved by an order passed under Section 271D of the Income-tax Act, 1961, imposing penalty on account of violation of acceptance of loan in cash exceeding Rs....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 2001

Keshab Narayan Banerjee Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Judge : Dilip Kumar Seth, J.

Decided on : Jul-05-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 117, 117(1), 132, 132(5), 132(11), 132A, 132B, 230A(1) and 263; ;Income-tax Act, 1922

Reported in : [2001]252ITR888(Cal)

Dilip Kumar Seth, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged a notice contained in annexure E to the writ petition at page 57. The said notice was issued under Section 263 of the Income-tax...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2001

Colliery Mazdoor Sabha of India Vs. Board of Industrial Financial Reco ...

Court : Kolkata

Judge : Dilip Kumar Seth, J.

Decided on : Jul-23-2001

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Section 25; ;Board of Industrial Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) Regulations, 1987 - Regulation 20; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Dilip Kumar Seth, J.1. The order dated 23-2-2001 passed by the Board of Industrial Financial Reconstruction in Case No. 501 /2000 of Eastern Coalfields Ltd. has since been challenged in this writ petition on the ground...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 2000

israil Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Judge : Dilip Kumar Seth, J.

Decided on : Dec-05-2000

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 16, 19, 21 and 226; ;West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973 - Section 213A(3)

Reported in : (2001)2CALLT70(HC)

Dilip Kumar Seth, J.1. Mr. Bari has filed an application for addition of party. The application is allowed. The applicant be added as respondent in this writ petition.2. After the application for addition of party is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2001

Om Roller Flour Mill Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Judge : Dilip Kumar Seth, J.

Decided on : Jun-22-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 7A and 71; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2002(94)FLR908],(2002)IIILLJ228Cal

ORDERDilip Kumar Seth, J. 1. The order dated March 14, 2001 contained in Annexure 'P- 11' has since been challenged. Learned counsel for the Petitioners contends that the provisions of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial