Advanced Search Results
Emperor Vs. Bal Gangadhar Tilak
Mumbai
Davar, J.
Jul-22-1908
Criminal
(1908)10BOMLR848
Davak, J.1. Gentlemen of the Jury, I am afraid, gentlemen, your patience has been sorely taxed during the eight days which this trial has taken. I do not propose to tax your patience at any great...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVithal at Vithoba Gorakh Shinde. Vs. Sangram Narsing Panchal.
Mumbai
Shrihari P. Davare, J.
Nov-24-2011
Sales Tax
ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Heard learned respective counsel for the parties. 2. This is an appeal preferred by the appellant (original complainant) challenging the judgment and order dated 21.10.2000, rendered by learned 3rd Jt. Judicial Magistrate First...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPoma Dongra Vs. William Gillespie
Mumbai
Davar, J.
Jan-16-1907
Contract
(1907)9BOMLR143
Davar, J.1. The plaintiffs in this case are a firm of Marwarry money lender's. The defendant William Gillespie is described in the plaint as manager of the Money Order Department, General Post Office, Bombay.2. The suit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kanji Dwarkadas Vs. Haridas Purshottam
Mumbai
Davar, J.
Jul-25-1911
Insurance
(1911)13BOMLR1211; 12Ind.Cas.897
Davar, J. 1. In the beginning of the year 1899 a country craft or dhow called 'Ali Madut' came to Bombay from Cutch and was chartered to sail to the sea-port town of Noshi Be in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNanu Narayen Kothare Vs. the Advocate General of Bombay
Mumbai
Davar, J.
Jan-24-1907
Property
(1907)9BOMLR370
Davar, J.1. This is an Originating Summons taken out by Mr. Nanu Narayan Kothare, the sole surviving executor of and trustee under the will of, the late Chanda Ramji against the Advocate-General of Bombay wherein he...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMavji Manji Vs. Kuverji Narronji
Mumbai
Davar, J.
Mar-21-1907
Civil
(1907)9BOMLR482
Davar, J.1. The plaintiff who is the owner of a godown consisting of three compartments situated in Kalyan street on one of the Port Trust estates sues two sets of defendants to recover from either the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPundlick Rowji Vs. Vasantrao Madhavrao
Mumbai
Davar, J.
Sep-20-1909
LimitationCivil
4Ind.Cas.586
Davar, J.1. I am satisfied that the summons in this case was not duly or properly served and that the defendant had no knowledge whatever of the institution or the hearing of this suit when the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Framji Cawasji Markar; in Re: Costs of Crawford and Co.
Mumbai
Davar, J.
Aug-15-1907
Civil
(1907)9BOMLR1014
Davar, J.1. On the 25th of July 1907 Messrs. Crawford Brown & Co., Solicitors of this Court, obtained a Summons calling upon the respondents to show cause why their bills of costs should not be lodged...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRalli Brothers Vs. Noor Mahomed
Mumbai
Davar, J.
Dec-03-1906
ArbitrationContract
(1906)8BOMLR955
Davar, J.1. The petitioners who are well known merchants carrying on business in Bombay have presented a petition to this Court praying that the legal proceedings instituted against them by Noor MohomedValley in the Court of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSir Jehangir Cowasji Jehangir Vs. the Hope Mills Limited
Mumbai
Davar, J.
Dec-03-1907
Property
(1907)9BOMLR1380
Davar, J.1. The plaintiff, Sir Jehangir Cowasji Jehangir as mortgagpe in possession of the property of the first defpndant Company The Hope Mills Limited, instituted tbis suit in August 1903 to recover the moneys due to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »