Advanced Search Results
Asstt. Commissioner of I.T. Vs. Arun Chemical and Pharmaceutical
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
D Manmohan, M Prasad
Jun-18-2003
Land Acquisition
(2004)91ITD286(Hyd.)
1. This is an appeal filed by the Revenue. It is directed against the order of the CIT(A)-II, Hyderabad, dated 17.2.1994 for the assessment year 1990-91, wherein he gave a finding that the two firms, M/s....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTransmission Corpn. of Ap. Ltd. Vs. Acit [Alongwith Sp Nos. 25 to
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
D Manmohan, J S Reddy
Feb-24-2005
Land Acquisition
1. There stay petitions are filed by the above mentioned assessees. The assessees are Public Sector Undertakings/Corporations owned by Govt. of Andhra Pradesh. By this Stay petitions, the assesees seek stay of demand arising from the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPremier Automobiles Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
J Bengra, Vice, D Manmohan, Jaidev
Nov-18-2002
Land Acquisition
(2003)84ITD169(Mum.)
1. This appeal pertains to the asst. yr. 1995-96. Though six grounds were urged by the assessee-company, at the time of hearing, ground No.2 is not pressed by the learned counsel. Therefore ground No, 2 is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/S. Agilsys It Services India P. Ltd. and Another Vs. Vaidya Chowk, B ...
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
The Honourable Mr. D. Manmohan, Vice President &Amp; the Honourable Mr. N.K. Billaiya, Accountant Member
May-17-2013
Land Acquisition
D. Manmohan, V.P. 1. These cross appeals are directed against the order dated 12.01.2011 passed by the CIT(A), Visakhapatanam and they pertain to A.Y. 2001-02. 2. In the appeal filed by the assessee a preliminary issue...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Mardia Extrusions Ltd. and Another Vs. Aayakar Bhavan Mumbai and ...
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
D. Manmohan, Vice President &Amp; Sanjay Arora, Accountant Member
Feb-13-2013
Direct Taxation
D. Manmohan, V.P. 1. These two appeals involve an identical issue and they arise out of the orders passed by the CIT(A)-8, Mumbai wherein penalty levied by the AO having been affirmed by the learned CIT(A),...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaghava Health Care Ltd. Vs. Dcit
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Vizag
D Manmohan, B Baskaran
May-16-2008
Direct Taxation
1. These three appeals, preferred by the assessee, are directed against the order of Ld CIT(A) Rajahmundry and they pertain to Asst.Years 1989-90 to 1991-92.2. As the issues contested before us are common in all these...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnique InvIn Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata
D Manmohan, P Goradia
May-21-1999
Land Acquisition
(2000)74ITD43(Kol.)
1. This appeal filed by the assessee-company is directed against the order of the CIT(A), Central-I, Calcutta and it pertains to the asst.yr. 1990-91.2. Assessee's claim of share dealing loss was rejected by the AO on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssistant Commissioner of Vs. Tribhovandas Bhimji Zaveri
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
D Manmohan, M Prasad
Aug-17-1999
Direct Taxation
(2000)74ITD92(Mum.)
1. This appeal is directed against the order of the CIT(A) dated 21-10-1991 for the assessment year 1988-89. 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(A) erred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhoir Sand and Allied Industries Vs. Deputy Commissioner of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
D Manmohan., M Prasad
Jan-11-2000
Direct Taxation
(2001)77ITD347(Mum.)
1. The only issue involved in this appeal is with regard to the eligibility to claim investment allowance on the cranes used in the process of bringing silt containing sand in the sea bed to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.R. Patel Vs. Deputy Commissioner of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
D Manmohan, J Accountant
May-08-2000
Direct Taxation
(2001)78ITD51(Mum.)
1. The assesses, an individual, is carrying on business of construction activities, in his own name and in the names of various partnership firms, where he is a partner. He has also dividend income, interest income,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »