Advanced Search Results
Narayan Balaji Bandivdekar Vs. Govind Sakharam Nimkar
Mumbai
Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J. and Crump, J.
Aug-17-1927
PropertyLimitation
AIR1928Bom28; (1927)29BOMLR1563
Crump, J.1. The plaintiff in this action sued to redeem a mortgage of the year 1807. The first Court held that the suit was within time. The suit was filed on June 18, 1920, that is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhailal Ntahabhai Vs. Kalansang Gulabsang
Mumbai
Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J. and Crump, J.
Aug-23-1927
Property
(1927)29BOMLR1558
Crump, J.1. [His Lordship held that the defendant was not a permanent tenant and then dealt with the plea of adverse possession thus: -] I now turn to the second question which has been raised in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVenkatraman Mukund Kamat Vs. Janardhan Baburao Kamat
Mumbai
Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J. and Crump, J.
Jul-19-1927
Family
AIR1928Bom8; (1927)29BOMLR1522
Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J.1. This is a suit by minors to set aside two deeds, Exhibits 85 and 86 of February 21, and June 25, 1921, executed by their father Mukund in favour of their cousin,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bhogilal Purshottam Vs. Chimanlal Amritlal
Mumbai
Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J. and; Crump, J.
Sep-29-1927
Arbitration
AIR1928Bom49; (1928)30BOMLR92
Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J.1. This is an extraordinary case, and one to which, in the view I take, the learned trial Judge has not given the care which it deserves. The suit is one to have...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Marmaduke Pickthall
Mumbai
Lallubhai Shah, Kt., Acting C.J. and ;Crump, J.
Sep-20-1922
CriminalContempt of Court
(1923)25BOMLR15
Lallubhai Shah, Kt., Acting C.J.1. This is a rule issued on the application of the Government of Bombay against Marmaduke Pickthall, the Editor, Printer, and Publisher of the Bombay Chronicle to show cause why he should...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Secretary of State for India Vs. Abdul Husen Dosaji Godwala
Mumbai
Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J. and Crump, J.
Jul-12-1927
Property
AIR1927Bom601; (1927)29BOMLR1350
Crump, J.1. The facts necessary for the decision of the present ease may be briefly stated as follows.2. The plaintiff purchased certain plot numbers in Survey No. 119 at Santa Cruz, and after his purchase he...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChintaman Raoji Naik Vs. Khanderao Pandurang Thakur
Mumbai
Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J. ;and ;Crump. J.
Sep-29-1927
Property
AIR1928Bom58; (1928)30BOMLR45
Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J.1. This is a very simple case though it raises points of general importance. One Pandurang died in 1904 leaving a widow and two sons, plaintiff No. 1 and plaintiff No. 2. His...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarilal Ranchhod Vs. Gordhan Keshav
Mumbai
Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J. and Crump, J.
Jul-18-1927
FamilyProperty
AIR1927Bom611; (1927)29BOMLR1414
Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J.1. [His Lordship after stating the facts of the case, proceeded:] It is not necessary for us in the present case to define what particular circumstances must exist before a person can be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShankar Bharati Vs. Narasinha Bharati
Mumbai
Lallubhai Shah, Kt., Acting C.J. and Crump, J.
Jul-10-1922
Civil
(1922)24BOMLR925
Lallubhai Shah, Acting C.J.1. This is an application for leave to appeal to His Majesty in Council. It is urged that as this Court set aside the decree of the lower Court and sent back the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGenu Tukaram Tapkir Vs. Narayan Raghu Tamhane
Mumbai
John Heaton, Acting C.J. and ;Crump, J.
Mar-24-1920
Property
AIR1921Bom51; (1920)22BOMLR1147
Heaton, Acting C.J.1. This is a case of some interest, partly because it is unusual itself, and partly because it has followed a somewhat surprising course. The plaintiff is a mortgagor and seeks to redeem. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »