Advanced Search Results
The Official Assignee Vs. Madholal Sindhu
Mumbai
Leonard Stone, Kt., C.J. and ;Chagla, J.
Aug-21-1946
Company
AIR1947Bom217; (1946)48BOMLR828
Leonard Stone, Kt., C.J.1. This is an appeal from the judgment of Mr. Justice Bhagwati dated September 17, 1945.2. In the action the plaintiff, respondent No. 1 in this Court, sought a declaration and consequential relief...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohanlal Sohanlal Vs. Pannalal Jankidas
Mumbai
Leonard Stone, Kt., C.J. and Chagla, J.
Apr-11-1947
Contract
AIR1948Bom133; (1947)49BOMLR736
Stone, C.J.1. This is an appeal by the defendants, as kartas of a joint Hindu family, from a judgment of Mr, Justice Bhagwati, dated March 27, 1946, whereby it was ordered that the plaintiff firm, who...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHabib and Sons Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai
Leonard Stone, Kt., C.J. and Chagla, J.
Sep-06-1946
Direct Taxation
(1947)49BOMLR200
Leonard Stone, Kt., C.J.1. This reference made to us under Section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, raises a very short point. By a decision of this Court, Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Ekbal & Co....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mangaldas Motilal and Co.
Mumbai
John Beaumont, Kt., C.J. and ;Chagla, J.
Sep-29-1943
Direct Taxation
AIR1944Bom153; (1944)46BOMLR138
John Beaumont, Kt., C.J.1. This is a reference made by the Commissioner of Income- tax under Section 66(3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, this Court having directed him to raise the question :Whether the order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Vallabhdas Karsondas Natha
Mumbai
Leonard Stone, Kt., C.J. and Chagla, J.
Sep-05-1946
Direct Taxation
AIR1947Bom382; (1947)49BOMLR189
Leonard Stone, Kt., C.J.1. This reference under Section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act raises a short point, though one which has shown a tendency to become obscure by the historical background and by the more...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNavnitlal Chunilal Vs. Baburao (No. 2)
Mumbai
Harilal Kania, Kt., Acting C.J. and ;Chagla, J.
Jul-03-1944
Tenancy
AIR1945Bom137; (1944)46BOMLR787
Harilal Kania, Kt., Acting C.J.1. This is an ejectment suit. It originally came for hearing before Blagden J. Having regard to the Bombay Rent Restriction Order, 1942, issued under the Defence of India Rules, 1939, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamchandra Lalbhai Vs. Chinubhai Lalbhai
Mumbai
Chagla, J.
Jul-17-1942
PropertyFamily
(1943)45BOMLR1075
B.J. Desai, J.1. The office of managing agents of a company is, distinguishable from the question of remuneration. Both are assignable : Section 87B of the Indian Companies Act, 1913. The defendant was a trustee for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLady Dinbai Petit Vs. M.S. Noronha
Mumbai
Harilal Kania, Kt., Acting C.J. and ;Chagla, J.
Oct-14-1945
PropertyCivil
AIR1946Bom407; (1946)48BOMLR255
Harilal Kania, Kt., Ag. C.J.1. This is an appeal from the judgment of Mr. Justice Coyajee. The material relevant facts are these.2. Under a trust deed dated January 17, 1931, the petitioners, who are trustees, held...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmperor Vs. Mukhtiyarkhan Tajamulkhan
Mumbai
Chagla, J.
Feb-17-1942
Criminal
AIR1942Bom207; (1942)44BOMLR432
Chagla, J.1. In this case the prosecution are calling one Ismail Amin Golandas, one of the panchas, to prove a panchnama prepared on August 12, 1941. This particular panch was not examined either before the Committing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHafasji Ibrahim Vs. Mangalgirji Mathuragirji
Mumbai
Chagla, J.
Feb-21-1945
Civil
AIR1946Bom201; (1945)47BOMLR845
Chagla, J.1. On June 10, 1942, a decree was passed in favour of the opponent against the petitioners by the Court of the Extra Avalkarkun at Godhra under Section 19 of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act ordering...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »