Advanced Search Results
Arjun Ram Pal and ors. Vs. Sadananda Sarma and anr.
Kolkata
Caspersz, J.
Dec-15-1910
Land Acquisition
9Ind.Cas.1
Caspersz, J.1. This is an appeal in a suit to obtain a declaration that a certain hut (together with doors, door frames etc.), is liable for the dues on account of a decree which the plaintiffs...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBishnu Charawn Modak Vs. Mohesh Chandra Mohanti and ors.
Kolkata
Caspersz, J.
Aug-09-1909
Civil
3Ind.Cas.87
Caspersz, J.1. This is an appeal by the defendant tenant against whom the plaintiffs brought an action to have it declared that certain lands covered by a kabuliat, dated the 1st Sraban 1299, were liable to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLalit Koer and ors. Vs. Babu Hit NaraIn Singh
Kolkata
Caspersz, J.
Dec-09-1910
Land Acquisition
9Ind.Cas.5
Caspersz, J.1. The plaintiff brought the suits, out of which these second appeals have arisen, for the purpose of enhancing the rents of his tenants under the provisions of the Bengal Tenancy Act. A Commission was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Altap Ali Vs. Sheikh Mohatap
Kolkata
Caspersz, J.
Dec-07-1910
Tenancy
9Ind.Cas.4
Caspersz, J.1. In its original form the plaintiff's suit included a prayer for amendment of the settlement khatian in which was recorded the defendant's name as to 1/3 share of the tank in suit. But, subsequently,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNobIn Chandra Shaha and ors. Vs. Kula Chandra Dhar
Kolkata
Caspersz, J.
Aug-26-1909
Tenancy
3Ind.Cas.402
Caspersz, J.1. The substantial question in these second appeals is whether the provisions of Section 29 of the Bengal Tenancy Act control Sections 30 and 31. These are three sections included within the enhancement of Sections...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJyotish Chandra Mukerjee and anr. Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Lawrence Jenkins C.J. and ;Caspersz, J.
Jun-30-1909
Criminal
4Ind.Cas.416
Lawrence Jenkins C.J.1. These are two separate appeals preferred by two accused who have been convicted and sentenced at the Bankura Sessions. The accused in Appeal No. 494 has been convicted under Sections 409, 465, 471...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGokul Dass Vs. Eastern Mortgage and Agency Company
Kolkata
Francis W. Maclean, E.C.I.E., C.J. and ;Caspersz, J.
Aug-26-1905
Property
(1906)ILR33Cal410
Francis W. Maclean, E.C.I.E., C.J.1. These are appeals from the decision of the Subordinate Judge of Murshidabad. The plaintiffs' claim, put shortly, is one to realize an equitable sub-mortgage, which they allege was created in their...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJonab Sheikh Vs. Surjya Kanta Acharjya Chowdhry
Kolkata
Chunder M. Ghose, A.C.J. and ;Caspersz, J.
May-22-1906
PropertyLimitation
(1906)ILR33Cal821
Chunder M. Ghose, A.C.J., and Caspersz, J.1. The plaintiffs in these cases are the tenants of cue Nawab Ali Chowdhry, the owner of mouza Musuddi, while the defendants are the zemindar of Jhupna, a neighbouring village,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKarnadhar Haldar Vs. Hari Prosad Roy Chowdhury and ors.
Kolkata
Caspersz, J.
Aug-27-1909
Civil
3Ind.Cas.338
Caspersz, J.1. The defendant-appellant obtained a decree against a third person in a suit to which the plaintiffs-respondents were not parties. The plaintiffs are landlords of the land in controversy and they brought their action to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLakshmi Narayan Maiti and anr. Vs. Gopal Chandra Maity
Kolkata
Caspersz, J.
Aug-10-1909
Property
3Ind.Cas.443
Caspersz, J.1. This appeal arises out of an application by the plaintiff decree-holder to recover the balance of his mortgage debt, otherwise than out of the property sold, under Section 90 of the Transfer of Property...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »