Advanced Search Results
In Re: T. H. Marshall an Insolvent
Kolkata
Broughton, J.
Jul-26-1881
Civil
(1881)ILR7Cal421
Broughton, J.1. The insolvent in this case had assigned his goods to Mr. Boileau prior to his insolvency, and the question is, whether they were in his own possession, order, or disposition when he became insolvent,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajnaraIn Bose and ors. Vs. the Universal Life Assurance Co.
Kolkata
Broughton, J.
Aug-30-1881
Criminal
(1881)ILR7Cal594
Broughton, J.1. The plaintiffs, executors of the will of Hurrish Chunder Bose (their father) seek to recover Rs. 25,000 upon a life policy which was assigned to their testator. They also seek to recover interest at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFehrsen Vs. Simpson
Kolkata
Broughton, J.
Sep-11-1878
FamilyProperty
(1879)ILR4Cal514
Broughton, J.1. Mr. Piffard, for Mr. Abercrombie, contended that the deed of 1874 is, according to Scotch law, a will and a disposition of the fund in terms of the will of Dr. Simpson. But there...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Juggut Chunder Roy and ors. Vs. Roop Chand Shaw and ors.
Kolkata
Broughton, J.
Mar-24-1881
Civil
(1881)ILR6Cal811
Broughton, J.1. Found that the defendants were partners, and gave a decree in favour of the plaintiffs against all the defendants, and ordered Roop Chand to pay the costs incurred by Tariney Pershad Shaw and Chand:...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Hurruck Chund Golicha
Kolkata
Broughton, J.
Jun-01-1880
Civil
(1880)ILR5Cal605
Broughton, J.1. On these facts, without reference to an affidavit in answer, filed a week ago by the petitioning creditor, and I think properly available to him in this enquiry, two questions have arisen: first, a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›