Advanced Search Results
Ardeshir Dadabhoy Baria Vs. Dadabhoy Rustomjee Baria
Mumbai
Blagden, J.
Aug-24-1944
Family
AIR1945Bom395; (1945)47BOMLR287
Blagden, J.1. This was an originating summons having the principal object of determining the validity or otherwise of certain trusts in favour of persons unborn at the date of the creation thereof.2. The facts are not...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdeally Hyderbhai Vs. Advocate General of Bombay
Mumbai
Blagden, J.
Jul-06-1945
Trusts and Societies
(1946)48BOMLR631
Blagden, J.1. By a deed of trust dated December 3, 1942, the late Mr. Abdeally Hyderbhai, hereinafter called the 'the settlor', settled a sum of money on certain charitable trusts, which I need not now go...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHubli Electricity Co. Ltd Vs. Government of Bombay
Mumbai
Blagden, J.
Jul-18-1944
Civil
AIR1945Bom370; (1945)47BOMLR415
Blagden, J.1. This is a petition by the Hubli Electricity Co., Ltd., against the Province of Bombay entitled 'In the matter of the High Court Suit No. 610 of 1944 (The Hubli Electricity Co., Ltd. v....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Paul Engel Vs. Edith Engel
Mumbai
Blagden, J.
Jun-18-1943
Family
AIR1944Bom15; (1943)45BOMLR921
Blagden, J.1. The parties in this suit are respectively husband and wife, and the claim is by the husband for dissolution of marriage on the ground of the wife's adultery with a man whose identity is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamjohn MehomoodIn Vs. Yahyabhai Abdul Kayum
Mumbai
Blagden, J.
Feb-20-1946
Civil
AIR1947Bom149; (1946)48BOMLR723
Blagden, J.1. This is an application for an amendment of pleadings made in rather peculiar circumstances. To his plaint, admitted on March 3, 1945, the plaintiff, who is claiming a dissolution of a partnership between himself...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShanta Apte Vs. Sailapati Chatterji
Mumbai
Blagden, J.
Jul-31-1945
Civil
(1946)48BOMLR636
Blagden, J.1. This is a summons by the defendants in the suit for revocation of the leave granted under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent to the plaintiff. It raises some important and rather difficult questions....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohandas Mulji Sicka Vs. the Collector of Bombay
Mumbai
Blagden, J.
Mar-01-1944
Tenancy
(1947)49BOMLR414
Blagden, J.1. This is a rule nisi for a writ of certiorari and subsidiary reliefs which has been obtained by Mr. Mohandas Mulji Sicka, against the Collector of Bombay. The circumstances are briefly these:-2. Mr. Sicka...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadhubhai Amthalal Vs. Amthalal Nanalal
Mumbai
Blagden, J.
Feb-25-1946
Civil
AIR1947Bom156; (1946)48BOMLR721
Blagden, J.1. This is an application under Order XVIII, Rule 17, Civil Procedure Code, made in the following circumstances:2. The hearing of the suit was concluded before me about a fortnight ago and I reserved judgment....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJessingbhai Jagjivandas Vs. Jivatlal Pratapsi
Mumbai
Blagden, J.
Aug-22-1946
Civil
AIR1947Bom487; (1947)49BOMLR428
Blagden, J.1. This is a motion by the plaintiffs in a suit brought with the leave of the learned Advocate General under Section 92 of the Civil Procedure Code against four defendants. But for a mere...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHimatlal Jasraj Vs. Rustomji Dastur
Mumbai
Blagden, J.
Jul-27-1945
Civil
(1946)48BOMLR635
Blagden, J.1. This is a motion by the defendant in the suit to set aside an ex parte decree passed against him on January 19 this year, under Order IX, Rule 18, or, alternatively, under Order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »