Advanced Search Results
Bai Monghibai Vs. Doongersey Lakhmidas
Mumbai
Beaman, J.
Aug-31-1917
Tenancy
AIR1917Bom46; (1917)19BOMLR887; 43Ind.Cas.273
Beaman, J.1. The point arising in this case is a very narrow one but in my opinion extremely difficult, if not impossible, to decide upon any recognized principle. The material facts are that the plaintiff owns...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahamad AmIn Vs. Husan Mahamad
Mumbai
Louis P. Russell, Acting C.J. and ;Beaman, J.
Oct-04-1906
PropertyCivil
(1907)9BOMLR65
Louis P. Russell, Acting C.J.1. Plaintiff herein one Mahamad Amin son of Mahamad Ibrahim filed a suit against his brother Hasan, the first defendant, the second defendant, wife of the first defendant and the third defendant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Government Pleader Vs. Maganlal N. Choksi
Mumbai
Lawrence Jenkins, K.C.I.E., C.J. and ;Beaman, J.
Apr-18-1907
Civil
(1907)9BOMLR866
Lawerence Jenkins, C.J.1. This is an application under Section 56 of Regulation II of 1827. whereby it is provided that a pleader accused of a criminal offence, or guilty of misbehaviour or neglect of duty, shall...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Andrew Yule and Co. Vs. Ardeshir Bomanji Dubash
Mumbai
Beaman, J.
Mar-27-1913
Contract
AIR1914Bom312(2); (1913)15BOMLR724; 20Ind.Cas.844
Beaman, J.1. Assuming the agreement of the 22nd November 1911, to charter the S 6 Gymeric to the plaintiffs for twelve consecutive voyages, to be in all respects good, there is still a question to be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGulam Rasul Vs. Balu Sayaji Chambhar
Mumbai
Beaman, J.
Feb-19-1907
Civil
(1907)9BOMLR527
Beaman, J.1. The facts appear to be that the plaintiff before the Mamlatdar has brought a suit on the 25th of October 1906 to recover possession of a house situated within the town limits of Kalyan.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSafurabai Vs. Abdullabhai Readymoney
Mumbai
Beaman, J.
Sep-28-1909
Criminal
4Ind.Cas.273a
Beaman, J.1. In resisting this application for sanction, two points were raised upon which I think it desirable to make my own view clear. Relying upon some dicta in the books I was told that the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.D. Sethna Vs. Mirza Mahomed Shirazi (No. 1)
Mumbai
Beaman, J.
Jul-11-1907
Civil
(1907)9BOMLR1034
Beaman, J.1. It will be convenient to descend from the general to the particular. As to the arguments founded on the maxim omnia prcesumuntur etc., it is to be observed that so far it cannot be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYamnabai Vs. Nanabhai Sadanand
Mumbai
Beaman, J.
Sep-27-1910
Property
(1910)12BOMLR1075
Beaman, J.1. This is a suit by the plaintiff, a Hindu widow, to recover maintenance from her brothers-in-law the defendants 1 to 6, defendants 4 and 5 being minors and defendant 6 their guardian, and the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Rassual Haji Cassum
Mumbai
Beaman, J.
Nov-09-1910
Property
(1911)13BOMLR13
Beaman, J. 1. In this motion eight persons complain that the Official Assignee has seized and is retaining as the property of the Insolvent certain buffaloes which, at the time the Official Assignee seized them were...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDwarkaprasad Raghubir and anr. Vs. Jamnadas Gordhandas
Mumbai
Beaman, J.
Oct-10-1910
Land Acquisition
9Ind.Cas.948
Beaman, J.1. This is a suit by the plaintiffs, the nephews of the deceased Raghunandan, against the defendant No. 1, who is the executor of his Will.2. The plaintiffs seek to recover their share of Raghunandan's...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »